
BG Wealth Sharing, according to authorities, claimed to provide guidance on crypto trading, advertised heavily on social media and offered “daily profit opportunities.”

Andreessen Horowitz’s crypto investment arm said its new fund would seek to back projects that “people keep using when the hype fades.”
Drift Protocol announced on Tuesday that it has laid out a recovery plan for users affected by the April 1 exploit, an incident that resulted in a major loss of roughly $295 million in user funds on the lending decentralized exchange (DEX).
Drift Protocol’s plan centers on a recovery token system tied to verified losses. The protocol said that every wallet affected by the April 1 exploit will receive a recovery token reflecting that wallet’s verified loss and a proportional claim on the recovery pool.
The exchange explained that each recovery token corresponds to $1 of verified loss, and that verified loss is calculated based on the treatment of protocol remaining balances and positions, following a methodology described in a section of the post.
Drift Protocol said the recovery pool will be seeded with the protocol’s remaining assets. Those assets will be converted into stablecoin form to lock in notional value, with the current notional value of remaining assets placed at approximately $3.8 million.
The protocol said the final converted figure in USDT will be announced once all swaps are completed. After the initial seeding, Drift described three ongoing streams that will grow the pool until it matches total exploit losses.
Alongside user recovery, Drift Protocol addressed the status of the Insurance Fund, stating that it was not affected by the exploit. The company said the notional value of the assets in the Insurance Fund before the attack was approximately $20 million.
It also explained that releasing funds from the Insurance Fund depends on a governance proposal and subsequent DAO voting, and invited participation in governance to determine whether the funds will be made available to depositors or added to the recovery pool.
Drift’s update also covered its ongoing recovery efforts across multiple fronts, stating that recovery work is supported by cybersecurity forensic and intelligence partners, ZeroShadow and Mandiant.
In parallel, the protocol said it has launched a bounty program in collaboration with Bybit and other partners. The bounty is described as a 10% reward on any successfully recovered assets. Drift said the program is publicly listed to increase participation from whitehats, security researchers, and the broader ecosystem.
Looking ahead, Drift Protocol said the relaunch is planned for the second quarter of the year, with the aim of returning as a “leaner, perps-native exchange” and placing an emphasis on security.
The company noted that security changes outlined in its plan are intended as direct responses to what the April 1 attack exposed. It also stressed that some key decisions will require governance approval, with those items going through a governance proposal and DAO vote before finalization.
Featured image created with OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com
Spanish bank Sabadell is the latest to join a consortium of European banks seeking to launch a euro-pegged stablecoin to make transactions more efficient and increase the dominance of Europe’s digital assets market.
On Tuesday, Spain’s fourth-largest banking group by assets, Sabadell, announced it will join the Qivalis consortium as traditional financial institutions wrestle with the fast-growing stablecoin industry and broader crypto market adoption, Reuters reported.
The Qivalis consortium was set up in Amsterdam in 2025 by several major European banks to develop and issue a Markets in Crypto Asset Regulation (MiCA) compliant, euro‑pegged stablecoin in the second half of 2026 to help counter the US dollar’s dominance in digital payments.
Sabadell’s CEO, César González-Bueno, said in a press conference that the Qivalis initiative “is primarily designed to make transactions more efficient and secure,” adding, “It is a European project that we believe makes sense, and we will indeed be part of it.
Notably, the project comprises a dozen European institutions, including ING, UniCredit, KBC, Danske Bank, and BNP Paribas. Last month, Spain’s BBVA, the country’s second-largest bank and one of the largest financial institutions globally, announced it had also joined the banking consortium.
As reported by Bitcoinist, the banking giant considers that collaboration is crucial to “create common standards that support the evolution of the future banking model and deliver financial innovation to our clients in a consistent and practical way.”
Reuters noted that the growth of the digital assets industry has prompted traditional institutions to find uses for blockchain technology within their businesses. Therefore, more financial institutions are also considering joining the Qivalis project.
A spokesperson for Spain’s fifth-biggest lender by market value, Bankinter, said on Tuesday it was in talks with the consortium and would update in early summer. In addition, non-listed Spanish entities, including Abanca, Kutxabank, and Cecabank, are reportedly considering joining Qivalis, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
The European bank consortium’s initiative comes as local authorities and industry advocates also push to grow the bloc’s stablecoin market to weaken US dominance over its payment systems.
At the Paris Blockchain Week in April, France’s Finance Minister Roland Lescure encouraged European banks to explore tokenized deposits and called for the development of more Euro-pegged stablecoins, highlighting that their volume compared to US dollar rivals was “not satisfactory.”
For context, euro-pegged stablecoins account for less than 1% of global stablecoin volume, which is significantly lower than the level that would be expected based on the euro’s broader influence in global markets.
Blockchain for Europe, an organization that represents international Blockchain industry players in the European Union (EU), affirmed that the MiCA framework has made euro-pegged stablecoins less competitive than their US-denominated counterparts, despite making them safe.
The group noted that skepticism prevails among European policymakers regarding the trajectory of euro electronic money tokens (EMTs) and that it has placed Europe on the “downward-sloping part of the regulatory Laffer curve.”
To address this, the organization suggested multiple reforms to MiCA to improve the regulated European stablecoin market and maximize its positive impact on the bloc’s industry, citizens, and businesses.

Zcash extended one of the strongest recent moves in the large-cap segment, setting a new year-to-date high of $590 after rallying more than 80% in six days. The move came as Multicoin Capital co-founder Tushar Jain disclosed that the firm has built a “significant position” in ZEC since February, framing the trade as a bet on renewed demand for private, seizure-resistant assets.
The disclosure added a high-profile institutional voice to a rally that had already pushed ZEC through key technical levels. Crypto analyst Cheds Trading posted a ZEC chart and described the move as “Strong continuation,” highlighting a breakout structure after ZEC reclaimed a major resistance area on the daily chart.
Jain’s thesis centered less on short-term market structure and more on the role of privacy assets in a changing political environment. In a thread on X, he said Multicoin had accumulated a sizable ZEC position over recent months and argued that Zcash represents a return to the original privacy-oriented ideals of crypto.
“Multicoin has built a significant position in $ZEC since February,” Jain wrote. “Zcash is a return to the cypherpunk ideals crypto was founded on.”
He then connected the investment case to concerns around wealth taxes and asset seizure. Jain pointed to proposed policy developments in California as a warning sign and argued that, if governments become more aggressive in targeting private wealth, demand could increase for assets designed to protect financial confidentiality.
“California’s proposed wealth seizures are a warning,” Jain wrote. “As the political trend to seize private wealth continues to grow, people and institutions will increasingly seek private assets to protect themselves.”
The argument is notable because it distinguishes between censorship resistance and financial privacy. Jain acknowledged Bitcoin’s core strength as an asset that cannot be easily frozen or blocked at the protocol level, but argued that transparent holdings still create a vulnerability if governments can identify owners and target visible balances.
“Bitcoin is censorship-resistant, no one can freeze your BTC or stop you from using it,” he wrote. “But that doesn’t stop the state from seizing known holdings through wealth taxes.”
On Wednesday, ZEC climbed to $549, marking a new YTD high, after a six-day surge of 66%. The below daily Binance chart shows ZEC moving decisively above a highlighted resistance zone, with price extending toward the upper range after a strong green daily candle.
Cheds’ “Strong continuation” comment captured the technical read from momentum-focused traders: ZEC had not merely bounced from a local base, but appeared to have broken above a prior supply area that had capped earlier advances.
That technical backdrop matters because ZEC has historically been a high-beta asset during privacy-coin rotations. When it moves, it often does so quickly. In this case, the price action was reinforced by a clear narrative catalyst: a known crypto investment firm publicly backing the asset as an expression of the privacy thesis.
Jain’s final point was the clearest expression of Multicoin’s investment logic. He argued that demand for private, censorship- and seizure-resistant assets is not theoretical but increasingly practical.
“We believe that truly private, censorship and seizure resistant assets have clear product-market fit and demand is accelerating,” Jain wrote. “We believe $ZEC is the cleanest way to express this thesis in public markets.”
At press time, ZEC traded at $581.
On-chain detective ZachXBT has shared details of the massive crypto Ponzi scheme that took over $150 million from unsuspecting victims before collapsing last week.
In a series of X posts, ZachXBT unveiled the details of a Ponzi scheme that had been operating under the DSJ Exchange (DSJEX), a fake trading platform, and BG Wealth Sharing, a fraudulent investment scheme, since 2025. The scam involved a fake CEO named Stephen Beard, a self-proclaimed professor who represented the platform to the public.
According to the Tuesday thread, DSJEX and BG Wealth advertised daily returns of 1.3%–2.6%, with referral commissions and rank-based bonuses. In addition, Beard pushed recruitment and fake trading signals through a group on Hong Kong messaging app BonChat.
The Washington State Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) recently explained that investors used these trading signals on the DSJ exchange and were led to believe that the crypto investments were generating returns.
BG Wealth and DSJ claimed to be licensed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), but the DFI found that neither of the forms filed by these companies indicated that they were registered with the SEC.
Thirteen regulators across five continents had issued public fraud warnings about the firms, including the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Philippines’ SEC, and Washington’s DFI.
On April 23, US law enforcement seized one of BG Wealth’s domains as part of a joint operation conducted by Operation Level Up and the Scam Center Strike Force. However, the scam continued to operate for roughly another week.
Last Saturday, Beard posted a video affirming that DSJEX would soon go public and demanded a 12% “tax” on account balances as a prerequisite for the regulatory process. But the scammers had already disabled withdrawals by this point.
After the US authorities’ involvement, the malicious actors laundered over $92 million in crypto assets across chains. ZachXBT noted that the scammers regularly rotated between domains and hot wallets to evade law enforcement.
Between April 27 and May 3, the crypto funds were laundered through token swaps, bridging via Bridgers, Butter Network, and USDT0, wrapping and unwrapping USDD, and consolidation of transactions across hundreds of addresses.
The crypto sleuth traced the millions in outflows through a timing analysis, located Solana/Tron deposits to Binance, and found matching Tron withdrawals. Then, he provided details to the relevant parties, including Tether, the Binance security team, OKX, and US law enforcement.
As a result, Tether froze $38.4 million on May 4, while another $3.1 million was frozen at various crypto services and exchanges, bringing the total to $41.5 million.
Despite the significant recovery, the on-chain detective noted that the scam’s $150 million assessment is “likely significantly higher since the scheme has been operating since 2025, with thousands of victim exchange withdrawals identified.”
Ultimately, he advised victims of DSJEX and BG Wealth’s scheme to file a police report in their jurisdiction to aid global investigations and potential restitution from laundered proceeds.
HTTP error 403 on https://cryptopotato.com/feed
Failed to fetch feed.
XRP Ripple is trading near $1.41, down -0.5% on the day, having recently broken above the $1.40 level that served as resistance through much of 2026’s early digestion phase. That’s a meaningful technical event, but it is also happening roughly -57% below the $3.30 peak XRP briefly touched when the Ripple SEC lawsuit appeals were formally dismissed in August 2025.
The question isn’t whether XRP has bounced. It clearly has. The question is whether this is a structural reset or a market still slowly exhaling after five years of legal pressure.
The specific tension here is between two legitimate readings of the same data. The legal overhang is gone, Ripple’s enterprise footprint has expanded materially, and a fresh wave of analyst models is projecting dramatic upside.
But on-chain activity has cooled sharply from its post-resolution peaks, and the XRP price still hasn’t reclaimed levels that would confirm a new bull phase rather than an extended consolidation.
The Ripple SEC lawsuit began in December 2020 when the SEC alleged that XRP constituted an unregistered securities offering, triggering a cascade of US exchange delistings and cutting off institutional access to the token at exactly the moment the broader crypto market was entering its 2021 bull run. XRP missed most of that cycle as a direct consequence.
A 2023 partial court victory, ruling that programmatic XRP Ripple sales to retail buyers were not securities, sparked a 70% price surge, but the case dragged on until both parties dropped their appeals on August 7, 2025, with Ripple settling for a reduced $50M penalty.
If you missed yesterday's $XRP announcement, this is what I was referring to.
Most people still don't get the significance, so allow me to elaborate:
During SEC v. Ripple Labs it surfaced that there were 1,700 NDA's between Ripple and other companies. A lot of people… https://t.co/L3eW1y6w7v
— Patrick L Riley (@Acquired_Savant) May 1, 2026
That resolution removed the single largest structural drag on XRP adoption in the US market. Within 24 hours of the dismissal, trading volumes spiked 140% to over $9.5Bn, and XRP surged +11% to $3.30. For further context on how the regulatory landscape shifted for XRP after the SEC resolution, the CLARITY Act debate that followed added another layer of forward-looking uncertainty that the market is still pricing.
What didn’t change: Ripple’s payment network still operates largely independently of direct XRP settlement. The company’s enterprise clients can use its infrastructure without routing transactions through the token. That distinction matters more than most headlines acknowledge, and it’s the central question now resurfacing as Ripple releases scale data on its treasury platform.
The chart above shows XRP price action forming a tightening wedge structure since the post-resolution high, with descending resistance meeting rising support near the current $1.41 level.
Recently, XRP’s bullish outlook has been boosted by Ripple’s announcement that its treasury platform, enhanced by the $1Bn acquisition of GTreasury in 2025, now connects 13,000 banks and manages $12.5 trillion in payments.
Investor Patrick L. Riley suggested that if 20 billion XRP tokens underpinned this volume, each could be worth $625. However, the scale of the network raises questions about whether XRP Ripple is a primary asset or merely part of the underlying technology.
Ripple’s David Schwartz addressed speculation fueled by 1,700 non-disclosure agreements in the SEC v. Ripple case, stating they are common in business and don’t indicate secret market-moving events.
Additionally, on-chain data shows a concerning drop in active addresses on the XRP Ledger, which plummeted from a peak of 626,854 on March 19 to 54,704 within four days, suggesting a loss of demand following a brief surge.
DISCOVER: 99Bitcoin’s Readers – Earn $10 USDC When You Sign Up for Binance
The price of $XRP is moving sideway, but net buying long positions are steadily increasing.
Someone is quietly preparing for a rise. pic.twitter.com/KSCs8edfUn
— CW (@CW8900) May 5, 2026
Key technical levels for XRP Ripple focus on whether $1.40 can transition from resistance to support. The 20-day moving average is around $1.38 and is currently holding above it, which is slightly positive. The 50-day moving average at $1.52 presents the first significant resistance, while the 200-day average near $1.85 is essential for confirming a trend reversal.
The RSI is neutral at 52, and the MACD shows a slight positive crossover but weak momentum. The stochastic RSI has recently reset from overbought levels, suggesting a possible pullback.
Analyst price targets vary widely, with Geoffrey Kendrick from Standard Chartered projecting $8 by the end of 2026 and a Finder panel averaging $5.25 by 2030. The newly approved spot XRP ETFs launched in October 2025 provide a new institutional inflow mechanism that could impact future rallies.
EXPLORE: Best Crypto Presales With Staking Rewards
Follow 99Bitcoins on X, YouTube, and Telegram for more crypto news and analysis.
The post Is the XRP Ripple Multi-Year Slump Finally Over? Assessing the Post-SEC Rally appeared first on 99Bitcoins.
The BlackRock Bitcoin IBIT ETF captured $136.6M in net inflows during a week when the broader Bitcoin ETF market lost capital for three consecutive sessions.
The week ended with $162.8M in total net inflows for spot Bitcoin ETFs, a recovery that was almost entirely driven by a single Friday surge of roughly $630M that erased four days of damage.
That Friday reversal was not random retail noise. It was institutional in character, and the forward implication is significant: Larry Fink and Cathie Wood are now signaling that Bitcoin’s next demand phase runs through formal access channels and permissioned inflows rather than open retail participation.
It comes as Bitcoin USD surged by +1.1% over the past 24 hours, hitting a session high of $80,750 and recording an explosive daily volume of $48.8Bn, offering a fresh wave of optimism across the market.
The flow divergence this week was notable: IBIT saw net inflows of $136.6M, while Grayscale’s GBTC experienced outflows of $73.6M. This highlights the structural differences between them: GBTC’s higher fees make it a more likely exit during risk-off periods, whereas IBIT’s model appeals to institutional clients and is less affected by panic selling.
Additionally, ARKB added $50.1M, and Fidelity’s FBTC contributed $48.5M, indicating the recovery involves multiple funds. IBIT’s significant inflow accounts for 84% of the week’s total, indicating where institutional allocators are making their initial Bitcoin investments.
Despite daily trading volumes exceeding $1Bn, the total Bitcoin ETF inflows since January 2024 stand at $58.72Bn, still below the $61.19Bn peak in October.
A previous exit of $6.38Bn between November 2025 and February 2026, during a price drop to $60,000, indicates a cautious institutional appetite, reflecting a shifted but incomplete transition in Bitcoin market dynamics.

(SOURCE: CoinGlass)
EXCLUSIVE: 99Bitcoin’s Readers – Earn $10 USDC When You Sign Up for Binance
Permissioned inflows refer to Bitcoin demand driven by institutions that have navigated compliance and regulatory approvals, rather than retail investors acting on impulse. This creates a different supply dynamic—slow to materialize but also slow to recede.
Larry Fink has emphasized this perspective, positioning BlackRock’s IBIT as an institutional gateway for Bitcoin, which is central to the product’s value proposition. The fund’s fee structure and growth reflect a focus on institutional clients. Similarly, Cathie Wood’s ARKB has seen significant inflows, aligning with her belief that institutional adoption is the key driver of Bitcoin demand.
As a result, Bitcoin’s demand curve is becoming less reactive. In retail-dominated markets, price drops often lead to panic selling. In contrast, when institutions are involved, price drops prompt authorized participants to create new ETF shares to meet demand by buying the dip. Recently, whales bought about $500M in Bitcoin at prices between $75,000 and $78,000, highlighting institutional behavior.
#ETH-BTC Golden Cross set for June or July
Last cross occurred in December 2020 pic.twitter.com/Ynn8CfYgEU
— Matthew Hyland (@MatthewHyland_) May 4, 2026
Bitcoin is trading at $80,600 at the time of writing, having briefly touched $80,750 before pulling back to test the $80,000 level as both resistance and potential support. A Golden Cross is forming on the daily chart, which occurs when the 50-day moving average crosses above the 200-day moving average, signaling that near-term price momentum is outpacing the longer trend.
Bull case: BlackRock Bitcoin IBIT inflows continue at the current pace or accelerate as more institutional mandates receive approval. Bitcoin clears $80,000 decisively, the Golden Cross confirms, and momentum traders pile in behind the institutional bid. Previous highs above $100,000 come back into view.
Base case: Permissioned inflows normalize at current levels, steady but not explosive. Bitcoin grinds in a range between $78,000 and $85,000 as cumulative ETF flows rebuild toward the October peak. Market stability improves, but price discovery stalls without a new catalyst.
Bear case: The permission gate creates a demand vacuum. Retail is priced out or locked out of meaningful participation; institutions remain cautious given macro headwinds. Bitcoin loses the $80,000 level and revisits the $75,000–$78,000 absorption zone.
EXPLORE: Best Crypto Presales With Staking Rewards
Follow 99Bitcoins on X, YouTube, and Telegram for more crypto news and analysis.
The post BlackRock Bitcoin ETF IBIT Is the Markets Safety Net as Institutions Demand ‘Permission’ appeared first on 99Bitcoins.
Iran's diplomatic overtures may signal regional de-escalation, yet unresolved negotiation impasses could prolong Middle East tensions.
The post Iran seeks comprehensive agreement with US amid diplomatic overtures appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Iran's defiance of US threats suggests prolonged regional instability, reducing prospects for peace and impacting diplomatic and market dynamics.
The post Iran rejects US threats, leadership stability likely through 2026 appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Andreessen Horowitz has raised $2.2 billion for a new crypto-focused investment fund as it targets infrastructure-led applications across digital assets. According to a blog post published by its crypto arm, a16z Crypto, the firm’s fifth fund will support founders building…
Solana and Google Cloud launched Pay.sh, letting AI agents pay for Google Cloud and other APIs using stablecoins on Solana.
Bitcoin, launched in 2009, revolutionized the world of cryptocurrencies. Now, tons of different digital coins exist. What’s their name,…
The post What are Altcoins? appeared first on Coinlabz.
The post What can you buy with bitcoins (BTC) in 2022 – Ultimate list! appeared first on Coinlabz.
Pay.sh enables AI agents to make stablecoin payments on Solana. Runs on Google Cloud Platform using the x402 protocol. Supports Machine Payments Protocol (MPP) for automated transactions. Allows per-API call […]
ChainCatcher 消息,据 CoinMarketCap 数据显示,BILL 上涨突破 0.062美元,24小时涨幅超 62%,48小时累计涨幅显著延续强势。 当前代币市值约1.53亿美元,全稀释估值达6.2亿美元,较开盘阶段累计涨幅超 313%,BILL 24小时交易量达约 2.50亿美元,交易量延续放大态势,市场关注度同步上升。 据悉,BILL 为 Billions Network 原生代币。该项目系面向人类与 AI 的验证网络,旨在在不暴露隐私数据的前提下,实现个体与 AI Agent 的身份验证与信任连接。
The post บาคาร่าออนไลน์ เว็บตรง อันดับ 1 เล่นบาคาร่าสด ปลอดภัย จ่ายจริง appeared first on https://dumbbell-exercises.com/.
The post บาคาร่าทุนน้อย เล่นยังไงให้ได้กำไร รวมเทคนิคทำเงินที่มือใหม่ต้องรู้ appeared first on https://dumbbell-exercises.com/.

The marketing industry has a vocabulary problem.
Ask any CMO about their distribution strategy and they will describe their content calendar. Ask about their channel mix and they will explain their paid media budget. Ask how they ensure their brand shows up inside the AI-generated answers their customers are already reading and most will go quiet.
“Distribution” has become a synonym for “posting.” That is why most brands are invisible.
Mohit Ahuja has been sitting with this problem since a campaign he ran at Cultbike.fit did something he did not fully understand until he looked at the data underneath it. His team had built a genuinely good piece of content: comedian Atul Khatri, sharp creative, the kind of video that earns internal praise before it earns external reach. It performed. It outperformed.
The creative quality was not why.
When Ahuja ran the analysis, distribution placement explained the outcome. The video had not found its audience because it was good. It found its audience because of precise, deliberate decisions about where and how to put it. “Great creative was necessary but not sufficient,” he says. “It was the distribution that turned a funny video into a conversation people were having at their offices.”
He spent the next few years asking a question nobody in the industry had a satisfying answer to: if distribution is what actually drives outcomes, why does no platform exist to aggregate it?
The Gap That Should Not Exist
Consider what has been built for every other part of the marketing function.
Content creation: dozens of tools, including now AI tools that generate unlimited output at near-zero cost. Paid advertising: entire platforms with sophisticated targeting, real-time bidding, and attribution infrastructure. CRM, email, analytics, social scheduling, all of it has been systematised, consolidated, and made accessible to teams of every size.
Distribution has not. The creator economy, newsletter ecosystem, podcast network, Reddit community, and Answer Engine landscape, the actual places where brand reputation forms and purchase decisions are made, remain a fragmented collection of individual relationships managed through emails, spreadsheets, and agency retainers, with no unified layer sitting above them.
This is the gap Ampli5 launched into this week. The company, based in Singapore and now live at ampli5.ai, is the first distribution aggregator for brand marketing. A single platform that connects brands to YouTube creators, newsletter operators, podcast networks, TikTok influencers, X communities, Reddit, programmatic inventory, and AI-answer visibility, and routes intelligently across all of them based on where the audience actually is.
That category, distribution aggregator, did not exist before this week. That is not positioning language. It is a description of the market.
Why AI Made This the Only Bet Worth Making
The arrival of AI content tools did not create the distribution problem. It made the cost of not solving it terminal.
When content was expensive, creative quality was a natural differentiator. Teams with resources had an edge. AI collapsed that asymmetry. Every competitor now has access to the same production capability. When everyone is producing at volume, volume is not an advantage. Creative quality, always difficult to sustain, becomes nearly impossible to maintain as a moat when the baseline has been raised across the entire market.
What AI cannot generate is distribution reach. The accumulated presence across the channels where your audience actually forms opinions, the creator relationships, the newsletter placements, the community trust, the answer engine visibility, takes time and operational sophistication to build. It cannot be prompted into existence.
Ahuja’s framework for this, what he describes as the infrastructure layer that sits between brands and the fragmented distribution landscape, is laid out in full at his blog. The essay makes the case for why distribution should be thought of as a utility rather than a vendor relationship, and why no one had built that utility until now.
The Aggregator Advantage
The Distribution Atlas, Ampli5’s data layer that maps where a brand’s target audience actually concentrates across the internet, is what makes the aggregator model work in practice. Before a campaign launches, the Atlas identifies where the density is. The platform then routes to those concentrations rather than broadcasting broadly.
The difference is the difference between finding your customer and hoping your customer finds you.
Rajat, CMO at Stader Labs, described the result concisely: “With Ampli5, we reduced our go-to-market timeline by two weeks.”
Two weeks on a launch cycle is not a marginal improvement. It is a structural change to how a growth team operates.
What Comes Next
Ampli5 is onboarding brand partners by invitation. The harder tests, whether the Atlas holds its predictive accuracy across categories, whether the aggregator model scales beyond D2C and fitness, whether attribution survives contact with enterprise requirements, are still ahead.
But the founding insight is not in question. The marketing stack has everything except the one layer that determines whether any of it works. The brands that have figured this out are already competing differently. The ones still conflating content production with distribution strategy are producing more content into the same invisible void.
The first distribution aggregator is live. The category is being created now, not later.
The early movers will be very hard to catch.
Mohit Ahuja is the founder and CEO of Ampli5. The platform is live at ampli5.ai.

Digital platforms have spent years monetizing attention, clicks, and data. Yet the most meaningful value online has always come from relationships. Relationship Finance (ReFi) reframes how value is created by turning trust, participation, and collaboration into measurable economic signals. Instead of rewarding passive activity or speculation, this model connects social engagement with blockchain-backed incentives.
MaAvatar applies Relationship Finance through a structured valuation layer that records interaction quality and community contribution. Supported by the $MAAVI token and guided by Maavi Bot, the ecosystem links identity, conversation, and token mechanics into one framework – where relationships become assets within a transparent, on-chain system.
In this post, let’s understand how MaAvatar built its valuation layer and how it impacts the ecosystem.
Traditional finance rewards capital allocation. Social platforms reward attention. Relationship Finance introduces a third model: value derived from verified relationships whether its between organisations or individuals.
In ReFi, trust, contribution, and long-term participation become measurable assets. Blockchain infrastructure makes these signals transparent and tamper-resistant. Instead of extracting value from users, ReFi frameworks aim to circulate value inside the network.
This approach connects social behavior with economic incentives. Relationships stop being invisible and start becoming structured components of a digital economy.
Many token ecosystems struggle with short-term speculation. Early participants accumulate rewards, liquidity leaves, and communities weaken.
ReFi addresses this by linking rewards to participation quality and contract completion rates. The focus shifts from passive token holding to active engagement and outcomes. That is where platform like MaAvatar position their model differently.
MaAvatar integrates ReFi into a social discovery platform. The goal is simple: relationships become the foundation of value creation rather than an afterthought.
MaAvatar translates ReFi from theory into protocol architecture with a DAO. Its model shifts value creation from transactions to relationships through a structured valuation layer built on attestations, mutual staking logic, and reputation-linked finance.
MaAvatar: Relationship Finance (ReFi) and valuation layer
Here’s how that architecture works:
The Attestation Engine converts social interaction into verifiable on-chain credentials. Inside MaAvatar, Maavi Bot acts as a relationship oracle. With user consent and privacy-preserving methods such as zero-knowledge proofs, it analyzes engagement patterns and issues Verifiable Relationship Credentials (VRCs).
These credentials may appear as non-transferable SBTs or signed proofs like:
All attestations are recorded in a dedicated registry smart contract deployed on a privacy-focused Layer 2 network. VRCs follow the W3C Verifiable Credentials standard, allowing portability.
The second module links trust with token participation through the $MAAVI token.
This module embeds ReFi directly into economic incentives.
The third module introduces collaborative financial instruments built around shared goals.
By linking commitment, accountability, and capital, MaAvatar creates a framework where social capital influences economic participation.
The $MAAVI token acts as the economic engine of the ecosystem.
Within MaAvatar, the $MAAVI token supports staking mechanisms, access to premium features, governance participation, and incentive alignment across the network.
Rather than rewarding passive speculation, the $MAAVI token aligns incentives with engagement inside the platform. Relationship Finance depends on this alignment to avoid extractive token dynamics.
$MAAVI tokens’ presale will be launched soon, powering premium features, NFTs, and exclusive benefits in the MaAvatar ecosystem.
Long-term value requires more than token incentives. It requires meaningful interactions.
MaAvatar combines:
MaAvatar also builds long-term network value by using Maavi Bot to improve relationship quality, which strengthens the valuation layer and reinforces the $MAAVI token economy.
Maavi Bot: Beta is now live
Together, these components form a practical implementation of Relationship Finance. Relationships become measurable. Contribution becomes trackable. Economic participation links directly to social participation.
That structure supports sustainable growth inside the ecosystem.
Relationship Finance introduces a model where trust and participation with contributions carry measurable value. MaAvatar applies this concept through a blockchain-backed valuation layer that connects user interaction, AI guidance from Maavi Bot, and the economic alignment of the $MAAVI token.
Instead of extracting value from attention, MaAvatar builds a system where relationships or collaborations shape the economy itself. In that structure, social capital turns into structured digital capital – forming the foundation of Relationship Finance inside MaAvatar.Visit www.maavatar.io to know more about the upcoming $MAAVI token launch, airdrops, and more.
Bybit has introduced an exclusive Cashback Booster for new Bybit cardholders, offering 10% cashback on lifestyle spending for a full 30 days. The cashback is applicable to crypto-funded transactions across eligible merchant categories, including restaurants, travel, transport, fashion, and beauty.
Most crypto holders face the same dilemma: should I sell to access cash, or hold and potentially earn nothing? Figure provides compromises for both, and even adds a $50 bonus for new users who deposit $500.
Caroline Crenshaw’s departure from the SEC on January 2 marks a turning point for crypto regulation in Washington. The longtime cryptocurrency skeptic’s exit leaves the commission operating under a 3-0 Republican majority—a historic shift that clears the way for Paul Atkins’ pro-innovation agenda to move forward without meaningful internal opposition.
Crenshaw spent over a decade at SEC agency, consistently raising concerns about cryptocurrencies, digital assets and investor protection.
Her exit coincides with the broader regulatory reorganization under the Trump administration, which has explicitly positioned itself to make the U.S. the “crypto capital of the world.”
The commission now operates with fewer members than authorized, as Trump hasn’t yet filled the vacant seats—a strategic pause that effectively gives the Republican-majority commissioners free rein on policy.
The timing couldn’t be sharper. SEC Chair Paul Atkins has already signaled plans to introduce an “innovation exemption” that would let crypto startups test new products under lighter regulatory requirements, provided they meet basic consumer protections. [3][7] That proposal was expected within 30 days of December 2, meaning it could arrive any moment. With Crenshaw gone, there’s no institutional voice pushing back on the exemption’s scope or implementation details.
The broader regulatory picture is also shifting. The Senate is scheduled to hold hearings in January on the CLARITY Act—landmark legislation designed to end years of turf warfare between the SEC and CFTC by clearly dividing jurisdiction over different crypto products. [3][7] White House crypto adviser David Sacks said in December the bill is “closer to passage than at any point in the past.” [3] These aren’t minor procedural tweaks. They represent a fundamental reordering of how Washington approaches digital assets.
The real action starts immediately. Watch for the innovation exemption announcement—it could drop with minimal fanfare. Then track the Senate hearings on CLARITY in January. If that bill moves to a floor vote and passes, the crypto industry will have concrete answers about regulatory jurisdiction for the first time in years. Markets have been pricing in regulatory clarity for months. Crenshaw’s departure removes one of the last obstacles to delivering on it.
The post SEC’s Pro-Crypto Shift Accelerates as Key Skeptic Crenshaw Exits appeared first on The Coins Post.
PEPE just ripped 26% higher on January 2, hitting $0.000005106 as trading volume exploded past $800 million.
That’s no thin pump—retail’s back, Robinhood holders sitting on 8.3% of supply, and a Hyperliquid whale named James Wynn dropped a bombshell prediction: $69 billion market cap by end-2026. If you’re trading memes, this is your wake-up call. Why now? New year FOMO meets bold calls in a market where BTC chills at $88k.

PEPE’s ERC-20 on Ethereum. No fancy DeFi twist here—just pure meme liquidity. Volume spiked 370-400% in 24 hours, open interest jumped 82% to $446.5 million on derivatives. RSI hit 67, screaming bullish momentum after breaking $0.0000042 resistance.
Whales aren’t dumping. That official “We ride at dawn” tweet lit socials on fire—crypto Twitter’s buzzing. Supply’s fixed at 420.69 trillion tokens. If Wynn’s right, that’s $0.000164 per PEPE. Math checks out. But Ethereum gas? Still a killer for small trades.
Total crypto cap up 1.07% to $2.99T. BTC +1.21% at $88,765, dominance slipping to 59.22%—alts eating its lunch. PEPE led top gainers, outpacing Story (+25%) and Mog. Volumes hit $164B market-wide. No massive liqs reported, but meme sector OI surging means leveraged degens are in.
BTC’s post-halving year ended red for first time ever—down 6% in 2025 despite $126k ATH. ETFs pulled $348M, but macro liquidity rules now. PEPE doesn’t care—it’s riding retail hype while big boys consolidate.
James Wynn, that Hyperliquid ser, straight-up said PEPE hits top meme status like SHIB did last cycle—if bull market holds. “We ride at dawn” from @pepe went viral. Community’s pumping: “PEPE to the moon” threads everywhere. No official team—it’s anon dev vibes.
Exchanges? Volumes exploding on Binance, MEXC. No rugs spotted. Traders on X calling for $0.000026 ATH retest. Sarcasm alert: Great timing for memes while BTC whales accumulate quietly. Holders care about flips, not halving myths.
But is this sustainable? Meme pumps fade fast.
Don’t get rekt. PEPE’s been rugged before—no premine, but watch whale wallets. Use hardware for big bags; software wallets fine for sub-$1k. Check Etherscan for suspicious transfers. Avoid leverage over 5x—OI spike means liqs incoming on pullbacks.
Actionable: Set stops below $0.0000042. DCA if you believe Wynn. DYOR on Hyperliquid perps for leverage without CEX KYC. Phishing’s rampant post-pumps—double-check links. If you’re aping memes, keep it under 5% portfolio. Skin in the game matters, but don’t YOLO rent money.
$0.000005 close today flips structure fully bullish. Watch BTC dominance drop—alts feast. Wynn’s $69B? Ballsy. If ETH L2s cut fees, PEPE volumes could 10x. Macro: Fed liquidity print January 2nd might juice risk assets.
Pullback to $0.0000045? Buy dip. Break $0.000006? Targets $0.00001 easy. Meme season back? You tell me. Trade smart—2026’s rewriting rules.
The post PEPE Explodes 26% in 24 Hours—James Wynn Calls $69B Market Cap by Year-End, Meme Degens Pile In appeared first on The Coins Post.
After three months of tight consolidation and repeated rejections at the $1.45 to $1.47 resistance zone, XRP is coiling for what analysts believe could be an explosive breakout.
Executive Chairman Michael Saylor has floated the idea of liquidating a portion of the company's massive 818,334 Bitcoin treasury.

The fund lets institutions earn yield on stablecoins while moving cash onchain with round-the-clock access.

The Bank of Italy’s deputy governor floated the evaluation of tokenized SEPA payments, as the ECB experiments with tokenized digital payment frameworks to avoid stablecoin competition.
European financial institutions should assess whether the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) can be extended into tokenized payments, Bank of Italy Deputy Governor Chiara Scotti said, as policymakers look for ways to keep euro-denominated settlement central to digital finance.
Scotti called a tokenized extension of SEPA an “important area for reflection” during a Monday speech at the Digital Assets and Monetary Policy Transmission workshop in Rome, saying Europe’s existing payments framework offers scale, shared standards and interoperability.
Her comments come as the Eurosystem prepares a pilot for Pontes, a distributed ledger technology settlement initiative designed to link market DLT platforms with TARGET Services and settle transactions in central bank money. The pilot is expected by the third quarter of 2026.
Read more
KelpDAO plans to relaunch rsETH cross-chain transfers using Chainlink after an April 18 exploit drained about US$292 million (AU$405.9 million) from its LayerZero bridge.
But a dispute over responsibility for the attack is intensifying.
KelpDAO said security reports showed compromised verifier infrastructure enabled the exploit. The company also alleged that LayerZero personnel approved the 1-of-1 verifier configuration tied to the breach without warning it posed a security risk.
LayerZero rejected that characterisation, saying the exploit was isolated to KelpDAO’s rsETH application and resulted from a verifier setup that deviated from its recommended multi-verifier model.
Related:K Wave Media Abandons Bitcoin Strategy for AI Pivot, Shares Tumble
Chainalysis said attackers linked to North Korea’s Lazarus Group stole about US$292 million (AU$405.9 million), or 116,500 rsETH, from KelpDAO’s LayerZero bridge on April 18.
The blockchain analysis firm said the incident was “not a smart contract vulnerability” but an off-chain infrastructure attack involving compromised RPC nodes and denial-of-service pressure against external nodes.
According to Chainalysis, the attack fed false data into the bridge’s verifier system, allowing fraudulent cross-chain messages to be accepted as valid.
KelpDAO later paused contracts and blocked a second attempted theft of 40,000 rsETH, worth about US$95 million (AU$132.1 million), Chainalysis said.
The Arbitrum Security Council also froze 30,766 ETH linked to the attackers. About US$71 million (AU$98.7 million) in crypto tied to the exploit is now at the center of a New York federal court dispute.
KelpDAO said it will migrate rsETH from LayerZero’s OFT standard to Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) and Cross-Chain Token (CCT) standard.
Supporting coverage said Chainlink CCIP uses 16 independent node operators to validate cross-chain transactions, replacing the architecture implicated in the exploit.
The attack also triggered broader market stress across decentralized finance protocols.
Following the exploit, Aave V3 Ethereum Core available liquidity fell from US$9.77 billion (AU$13.58 billion) to US$5.75 billion (AU$7.99 billion) within 29 hours, according to Glassnode.
Available WETH liquidity dropped from US$689 million (AU$957.7 million) to US$1.5 million (AU$2.1 million) in just two hours as utilisation reached 100%.
Read more: Uphold Pays US$5M Over Collapsed CredEarn Crypto Scheme
The post KelpDAO Blames LayerZero for $292M Exploit, Plans Chainlink-Powered Relaunch appeared first on Crypto News Australia.
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act faces a crucial two-week Senate window, shortly after a stablecoin yield compromise moved the crypto market-structure bill closer to committee action.
Speaking at Consensus 2026 in Miami on May 5, Garlinghouse said the bill’s chances would “drop precipitously” if lawmakers fail to address it within the next two weeks. He warned that the issue could become too politically loaded as the 2026 midterm campaign cycle accelerates.
Garlinghouse acknowledged the bill’s compromises but urged the industry to focus on the alternative. “Do I think it’s perfect? Hell no,” he said. “There’s tradeoffs and compromises, but I do think clarity is better than chaos.”
Read more: Bitcoin Stalls Below $80K as Bear Market Resistance Caps Rally
The CLARITY Act has already passed the House and advanced through the Senate Agriculture Committee in a January markup, but it still needs Senate Banking Committee approval before it can move to the full Senate. That makes the next committee step the immediate bottleneck.
Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks released a compromise stablecoin yield language on May 1 after months of Senate stalemate. Basically, the deal prohibits stablecoin rewards or yields that are economically or functionally equivalent to interest on a bank deposit.
The same compromise preserves incentives tied to bona fide activity, including payments, transfers, trading and other genuine platform use. That distinction gives crypto firms a path to reward network activity while addressing banking-sector concerns that yield-bearing stablecoins could draw deposits out of traditional institutions.
The yield dispute had been the largest procedural roadblock preventing Senate Banking from scheduling a markup. Garlinghouse’s comments suggest industry leaders now see the compromise as imperfect but necessary to preserve the 2026 legislative window.
Regulators are not waiting entirely on Congress. The CFTC said on March 17 that it joined an SEC interpretation clarifying how federal securities laws apply to certain crypto assets and transactions, a move CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig called long-awaited guidance.
SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins said the interpretation was a beginning, not an end. He has also said only Congress can future-proof crypto regulation through comprehensive market-structure legislation.
Related: Uphold Pays US$5M Over Collapsed CredEarn Crypto Scheme
The post Ripple CEO Says Crypto Bill Faces Crucial Two-Week Window in U.S. Senate appeared first on Crypto News Australia.
U.K.'s FCA approves new rules for tokenized funds, simplifying tokenization and enhancing the asset management sector's growth and innovation.
The post UK sets new rules for fund tokenization under current regulations appeared first on CoinGeek.
Australia’s banks urged to upgrade cybersecurity as AI threats evolve fast, with APRA flagging gaps in current safeguards and rising systemic risk.
The post Cybersecurity strains grow as AI challenges Australian banks appeared first on CoinGeek.
HTTP error 403 on https://ambcrypto.com/feed
Failed to fetch feed.
The protocol shift comes as a $71 million court fight continues to unfold.
CME's upcoming futures product will track whether the market thinks the price of Bitcoin is about to swing wildly or stay steady.
HTTP error 403 on https://cryptoslate.com/feed
Failed to fetch feed.
HTTP error 410 on https://magazine.cointelegraph.com/feed
Failed to fetch feed.
Bitcoin Magazine

Sequans Sells Half Its Bitcoin Holdings as Revenue Falls and Losses Mount
Paris-based Sequans Communications sold 1,025 bitcoin during the first quarter of 2026, cutting its digital asset reserves nearly in half as the IoT semiconductor maker grappled with declining revenue and mounting losses tied to a treasury strategy that has turned from ambitious to burdensome.
The sale reduced Sequans’ bitcoin position from 2,139 BTC at year-end 2025 to 1,114 BTC by April 30, marking the second major disposal in six months for a company that less than a year ago proclaimed plans to accumulate 3,000 bitcoin as a “long-term store of value”.
The financial pressure is evident in the numbers. Sequans reported revenue of $6.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, down 24.8% from $8.1 million a year earlier. The year-over-year comparison reveals the company’s vulnerability: the prior-year period included significant license and services revenue from Qualcomm that did not recur, exposing the underlying weakness in product sales.
While product sales did increase 45% from the year-ago quarter, gross margin compressed to 37.7% from 64.5% as lower-margin hardware displaced the lucrative licensing income. For a company burning cash, the shift in revenue mix compounds the challenge.
The bitcoin holdings that CEO Georges Karam once framed as a balance-sheet asset have become a source of substantial losses. Operating losses reached $50.5 million in the quarter, driven by $29.3 million in unrealized impairment charges on bitcoin holdings and $11.7 million in realized losses from selling the digital assets.
The company used bitcoin sale proceeds to redeem convertible debt and fund an American Depositary Share buyback program, a pragmatic move to reduce liabilities but one that underscores how the treasury strategy has shifted from accumulation to liquidation.
The remaining bitcoin holdings are largely encumbered. Of the 1,114 BTC held as of April 30, 817 bitcoin — representing 73% of current holdings valued at $62.3 million — remained pledged as collateral for $35.9 million in outstanding convertible notes. The pledged bitcoin exceeds the debt value, reflecting the over-collateralization required by lenders wary of cryptocurrency volatility.
The remaining debt is scheduled for redemption by June 1, 2026, after which all bitcoin will be unrestricted and available for sale. Whether Sequans will retain those assets or continue liquidating to fund operations remains an open question.
Net loss totaled $54.3 million, or $3.73 per diluted ADS, compared to $7.3 million, or $0.29 per ADS, in the prior-year quarter. Even on a non-IFRS basis—which excludes impairment charges, stock-based compensation, and accounting adjustments related to convertible debt—the net loss was substantial at $20.7 million, or $1.42 per ADS.
CEO Georges Karam framed the bitcoin sales as “decisive steps to simplify and strengthen our balance sheet,” while highlighting momentum in the company’s core IoT semiconductor business.
He cited a growing backlog, maturing design wins, and customer interest in Cat-M, Cat-1bis, and 5G eRedCap connectivity solutions, as well as new RF transceivers for drones and defense applications.
Sequans shares have fallen 51.5% over the past six months to $3.01, reflecting investor skepticism about both the bitcoin strategy and the core business trajectory.
The company ranks 40th among publicly traded firms holding bitcoin, far behind Strategy’s 818,334 BTC and Twenty One Capital’s 43,514 BTC.
This post Sequans Sells Half Its Bitcoin Holdings as Revenue Falls and Losses Mount first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Kraken Partners With MoneyGram to Enable Crypto Cash-Outs at 500,000 Locations Worldwide
Kraken will allow customers to convert cryptocurrency into cash at MoneyGram locations across more than 100 countries, addressing a longstanding gap in the digital asset ecosystem, according to an exclusive report from Fortune.
The partnership gives Kraken users access to nearly 500,000 physical locations worldwide, where they can exchange crypto holdings for local currency. The move targets a key friction point in crypto markets: while digital transfers settle with speed, converting assets into cash often involves multiple steps, limited banking access, or delays.
The initiative reflects rising demand for reliable cash access, driven in part by Kraken’s expanding presence in regions with unstable currencies.
Kraken co-CEO Arjun Sethi told Fortune that demand for reliable cash access has grown alongside the exchange’s international user base, especially in regions with unstable currencies. In those markets, users often treat crypto platforms as alternatives to banks.
“They want to store in USD or USD equivalent,” Sethi said. “They want to get yield. They want to do payments. They want to move money back and forth.”
That usage pattern creates a need for dependable off-ramps into cash. Through the MoneyGram network, Kraken users can bridge digital balances with local currency pickup, paying a variable exchange fee tied to each transaction.
The deal also marks a strategic shift for MoneyGram, a legacy payments company that has worked to modernize its operations after losing ground to fintech firms and digital banks. The company has focused on integrating digital assets into its infrastructure as part of a broader effort to reposition its business.
MoneyGram has spent recent years building crypto infrastructure, including a noncustodial wallet and deeper integration of stablecoins into its payment flows. The company has positioned stablecoins as a backbone for cross-border transfers, aiming to reduce costs and settlement delays tied to traditional rails. A private equity acquisition in 2023 gave the firm room to pursue that transformation outside public markets.
For Kraken, the deal adds to a period of expansion as it prepares for a potential public listing. The exchange has broadened its product suite beyond spot crypto trading, acquiring futures platform NinjaTrader and derivatives venue Bitnomial. Those moves reflect a strategy to compete across asset classes while strengthening its appeal to both institutional and retail users.
Despite its institutional focus, Kraken’s growth in emerging markets has shaped product priorities. Access to cash remains critical in economies where banking infrastructure lacks reach or trust.
The tie-up with MoneyGram signals a convergence between crypto platforms and traditional financial networks, where physical locations still play a key role. It also highlights how adoption depends not only on digital innovation, but on practical access to money in everyday form.
Kraken has not disclosed a full timeline for global rollout or its IPO plans, though it filed draft registration documents in late 2025.
This post Kraken Partners With MoneyGram to Enable Crypto Cash-Outs at 500,000 Locations Worldwide first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Lumen Technologies delivered first-quarter 2026 revenues totaling $2.9 billion, exceeding analyst consensus of $2.83 billion. Despite the revenue outperformance, shares declined 0.32% in extended trading to $9.30.
The headline grabber was the bottom-line miss. The telecommunications company reported a per-share loss of $0.47, substantially worse than the Street’s forecast for a $0.13 loss — representing a miss exceeding 260%.
Adjusted EBITDA registered at $849 million, translating to a 29.3% margin, marking a decline from the $929 million recorded in the corresponding quarter of the previous year.
Lumen Technologies, Inc., LUMN
Concurrently with its financial disclosure, Lumen revealed plans to purchase Alkira, a cloud-based networking platform, in an all-cash transaction valued at $475 million. The acquisition aims to equip Lumen with software-driven network management capabilities enabling rapid network deployment and configuration.
CFO Chris Stansbury characterized Alkira as the missing piece of Lumen’s digital infrastructure puzzle. “It accelerates it, it is capex that we do not have to invest now,” he explained to Reuters.
Executives anticipate the transaction will maintain margin neutrality initially before contributing positively to earnings. Lumen confirmed it will maintain leverage ratios below 4.0x following deal completion.
For the first time in company history, strategic revenue climbed to $1.246 billion, representing 51% of overall business revenue. This marks a significant shift from the 45% share recorded twelve months earlier.
Strategic revenue expanded 9.4% on a year-over-year basis and increased 4.7% from the previous quarter. Meanwhile, legacy revenue contracted 13.5% compared to the prior year.
The Public Sector division delivered particularly strong performance, generating $506 million in revenue — representing year-over-year growth of 5.2% and sequential expansion of 10.5%.
Lumen’s Private Connectivity Fabric (PCF) business posted mid-single-digit growth, bolstered by new contracts with the State of California. The company now manages approximately $13 billion in aggregate PCF contracts, including an agreement to enhance Anthropic’s fiber infrastructure throughout North America.
Network-as-a-Service (NaaS) customer count surged 25% quarter-over-quarter, reaching roughly 2,500 clients as of May 1, 2026. Deployed fabric ports jumped 35% from the preceding quarter.
The company elevated its 2026 free cash flow guidance to a range of $1.9B–$2.1B, up from the previous estimate of $1.2B–$1.4B. This upward revision primarily reflects $729 million in proceeds from divesting its fiber-to-the-home operations to AT&T, now categorized as operating cash flows.
Full-year capital spending is projected at $3.2B–$3.4B, while adjusted EBITDA is forecast to land between $3.1B and $3.3B.
Following the Alkira transaction’s completion, Lumen’s total addressable market would expand to approximately $70 billion — comprising $12 billion in North-South connectivity infrastructure and $58 billion in East-West connectivity linking data centers with cloud service providers.
Shares have delivered a 118% return over the trailing twelve months and have appreciated nearly 19% in 2026. The stock’s 52-week peak stands at $11.95, with current levels around $9.30.
Company leadership projects reaching EBITDA stabilization by year-end 2026 and anticipates resuming overall business revenue growth by 2028.
The post Lumen Technologies (LUMN) Shares Dip as Earnings Loss Widens Beyond Forecasts appeared first on Blockonomi.
Lumentum (LITE) delivered what executives called their strongest quarterly performance ever on Tuesday, featuring 90% year-over-year revenue growth and earnings that handily exceeded Wall Street’s projections. Yet shares tumbled 5.6% in after-hours trading.
Lumentum Holdings Inc., LITE
The optical technology company announced adjusted earnings per share of $2.37 for its fiscal third quarter ending March 28. This result exceeded the Street’s consensus forecast of $2.26 and marked a significant leap from $0.57 reported during the comparable period last year.
Quarterly revenue reached $808.4 million, topping analyst projections of $802.94 million. This represents substantial growth compared to the $425.2 million generated in the year-ago quarter.
Despite exceeding expectations across key metrics, investor sentiment turned negative. Market participants fixated on a dramatic escalation in the company’s current portion of long-term debt, which skyrocketed from $10.6 million to $3.24 billion within a single quarter. This substantial increase stems from funds raised through a convertible preferred stock offering completed in March 2026.
Chief Executive Michael Hurlston emphasized achievements beyond revenue acceleration. “While our top line growth continues to garner headlines, the more impressive part of our recent performance has been our margin expansion,” he stated.
Adjusted gross margin advanced to 47.9% from the previous quarter’s 42.5%. Meanwhile, adjusted operating margin improved to 32.2% from 25.2%. Hurlston credited these gains to disciplined pricing strategies, operational efficiency initiatives, and a favorable product portfolio mix featuring laser chips, pump lasers, and narrow linewidth laser assemblies.
Such consecutive quarterly margin improvements typically draw investor interest—though they also prompt questions regarding sustainability.
The 5.74% earnings beat extends an established pattern. Lumentum has now exceeded EPS estimates in each of the past four quarters. The preceding quarter delivered an even larger 18.44% surprise.
For fiscal Q4 2026, Lumentum provided earnings guidance of $2.85 to $3.05 per share, with a midpoint of $2.95. Analyst consensus had called for $2.69.
Regarding revenue, management projected a range of $960 million to $1.01 billion, with a midpoint of $985 million—considerably above the $917.3 million consensus estimate.
Current full-year analyst expectations stand at $7.69 in earnings per share on $2.91 billion in total revenue.
Shares of LITE have climbed roughly 164.8% year-to-date, dramatically outpacing the S&P 500’s 5.2% return during the identical period.
Zacks Research presently assigns LITE a Hold rating (Rank #3), indicating expectations for market-inline performance in the near term.
The Communication – Components sector, where LITE operates, currently ranks within the top 10% among more than 250 industries tracked by Zacks.
The post Why Lumentum (LITE) Stock Tumbled 6% After Crushing Earnings Expectations appeared first on Blockonomi.
War shock reshapes central-bank calculus: downside for growth, upside for inflation, making precautionary rate increases an option for the coming months. As for today, the ECB and Bank of England are seen keeping rates unchanged.
Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet earnings split tech stocks as AI spending concerns weigh on the Nasdaq 100 and shape the stock market outlook.