
Thailand’s SEC seeks comments on rules requiring retail-accessible overseas crypto derivatives to trade on qualifying, centrally cleared exchanges.

Need to know what happened in crypto today? Here is the latest news on daily trends and events impacting Bitcoin price, blockchain, DeFi, Web3 and crypto regulation.
Shiba Inu’s daily burn rate jumped 1,020% after 20.82 million SHIB were sent to dead wallets, according to Shibburn tracker data.
The spike gives SHIB holders another supply-reduction headline, but it needs careful framing. A large percentage increase in daily burn rate can sound dramatic, especially when the prior day’s burn was low. The actual token amount matters just as much as the percentage.
In this case, 20.82 million SHIB were burned.
That is meaningful as a community activity signal, but it should not be described as a major supply shock for a token with a very large circulating supply.
For more details, visit the official Shibburn platform.
Token burns are central to Shiba Inu’s community narrative.
The idea is simple: sending tokens to dead wallets permanently removes them from circulation. Over time, holders hope that repeated burns can reduce supply and improve scarcity.
That narrative has helped keep SHIB’s community engaged.
Burns give holders something to track beyond price. They create visible activity and reinforce the idea that supply reduction is part of the ecosystem’s long-term story.
But the scale matters.
A 1,020% burn-rate increase looks huge.
But burn-rate percentages are sensitive to the prior comparison period. If one day’s burn is small, the next day can show a massive percentage gain even if the actual token amount is modest.
That is why the 20.82 million SHIB figure is essential.
It gives readers the real scale of the event. The burn is notable, but it is not enough on its own to materially change SHIB’s supply profile.
Responsible burn coverage needs both numbers: percentage change and token amount.
Even if the burn is not a supply shock, it still matters for sentiment.
Shiba Inu’s community pays close attention to burn data. Higher burn activity can support engagement, especially during periods when meme assets are competing for attention.
Community-driven tokens often depend on visibility.
Burns, ecosystem updates, exchange flows, and social activity all contribute to whether traders keep watching.
The latest burn spike gives SHIB holders a fresh data point.
Supply reduction is only one side of the market.
For SHIB to build durable strength, burns need to be paired with demand, liquidity, utility, or broader meme coin appetite. Removing tokens from circulation helps only if the market also wants the remaining supply.
That is why burn headlines can be overread.
A burn spike may support sentiment, but it does not guarantee price movement.
Shiba Inu saw a sharp daily burn-rate spike, with 20.82 million SHIB removed from circulation.
That is useful for community tracking and supply-reduction narrative building. But it should not be framed as a dramatic change to SHIB’s overall economics.
The next thing to watch is consistency.
If burns remain elevated over time, the story becomes stronger. If this is a one-day spike, it may be more of a sentiment marker than a structural shift.
This article is based on public burn data from Shibburn.
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
Polkadot is leading major blockchain networks in a decentralization comparison based on the Nakamoto coefficient, according to public Chainspect data.
The Nakamoto coefficient is used to estimate how many independent entities would need to collude to compromise a network’s core operation. A higher score generally points to a more distributed validator or operator set.
That makes the metric useful, but not absolute.
Decentralization is not one number. It involves validators, stake distribution, client diversity, governance, infrastructure dependencies, token distribution, and real-world control. Polkadot’s lead on this metric is meaningful, but it should not be treated as a complete guarantee of security or adoption.
For more details, visit the official Chainspect platform.
Crypto networks are built around the idea of decentralization.
But measuring decentralization is difficult. Some networks have thousands of nodes but concentrated stake. Others have distributed validators but centralized infrastructure. Some have strong technical decentralization but governance bottlenecks.
The Nakamoto coefficient tries to capture one important piece of the puzzle.
It asks how many entities would need to coordinate to compromise the system. The higher the number, the harder coordination becomes.
That is why Polkadot’s position on the metric matters.
It gives the ecosystem a concrete decentralization talking point.
Polkadot was designed around shared security, parachains, validators, nominators, and governance.
Its structure differs from many single-chain networks. That can make decentralization harder to compare directly, but it also gives Polkadot a distinctive security model.
A strong Nakamoto coefficient suggests that control is relatively distributed across its validator or staking set.
For an ecosystem built around interoperability and shared security, that is an important signal.
The market should not confuse decentralization leadership with user growth.
A network can be highly decentralized and still struggle with liquidity, developer traction, or application demand. Another network can be more centralized in some ways and still attract heavy usage.
Both things matter.
Polkadot’s decentralization strength is a real advantage, but it does not automatically solve every ecosystem challenge. The network still needs compelling applications, active developers, capital, users, and easier onboarding.
Even if decentralization is not the same as price performance, it can affect long-term confidence.
Developers may prefer networks with stronger resilience. Institutions may examine decentralization when assessing risk. Communities may value governance distribution and validator diversity.
A strong decentralization metric can also help Polkadot stand out in a crowded market.
Many chains compete on speed, fees, incentives, or TVL. Polkadot can point to security and decentralization as part of its core identity.
Polkadot’s Nakamoto coefficient lead is a useful signal for the network’s decentralization narrative.
It shows that the ecosystem still has a strong technical and governance foundation. But it is not a full verdict on Polkadot’s future.
The network needs to turn that structural strength into visible adoption.
For now, Polkadot can credibly claim one of the stronger decentralization profiles among major chains. The next challenge is making that matter to users and builders.
This article is based on public decentralization metrics from Chainspect.
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
The SEC has charged 38 entities for allegedly using false filings to make themselves appear legitimate as registered investment advisers.
The agency’s action, announced in Press Release 2026-148, targets entities accused of feigning regulatory status through misleading filings. The case is not limited to crypto, but it matters for digital asset markets because false legitimacy is a recurring problem across online investment schemes, token offerings, advisory services, and trading platforms.
In crypto, perceived regulatory status can be powerful.
A firm that appears registered or supervised may attract investors who believe it is safer than it really is. That is why enforcement around false adviser filings matters even when the case is broader than digital assets alone.
For more details, visit the official Sec platform.
Investors often look for regulatory signals before trusting a financial platform.
Registered investment adviser status can make a firm look more credible. It suggests oversight, disclosure obligations, compliance systems, and accountability. If that status is faked or misrepresented, investors can be misled before they even assess the actual product.
That risk is especially high online.
Websites, social media profiles, offering documents, and marketing materials can all be designed to create an impression of legitimacy. A false filing can become part of that illusion.
The SEC’s action targets that front end of investor deception.
Crypto investors are familiar with fake legitimacy.
Scam projects often claim partnerships, licenses, exchange listings, audits, regulatory approvals, or institutional backing that do not exist. Some create professional-looking documents or misuse regulator names to appear safer.
The tactic works because investors want shortcuts.
A logo, filing reference, or registration claim can make a risky operation look official. That is why regulators pay attention to false or misleading public records.
Even if this SEC action is broader than crypto, the lesson applies directly.
Public filing systems are useful because they create transparency.
But bad actors may try to exploit them. If an entity can submit information that appears in a public database, it may use that appearance to market itself as regulated or approved.
The SEC’s action suggests the agency is watching for that abuse.
For investors, the key is to verify not only that a filing exists, but what it actually means. A filing is not automatically proof of approval. Registration status, disciplinary history, exemptions, and legal obligations all require careful checking.
This point is critical.
Regulators do not endorse a company simply because its name appears somewhere in a public database. A filing may be incomplete, misleading, pending, withdrawn, false, or otherwise not equivalent to approval.
Crypto investors should be especially careful here.
Many scams rely on the difference between “filed something” and “approved by a regulator.” The gap can be huge.
The SEC’s action against 38 entities reinforces that distinction.
Investors should verify claims directly with official regulator tools, not marketing materials.
They should check whether a firm is actually registered, whether the registration is active, what services it is authorized to provide, and whether there are warnings or enforcement actions attached.
For digital asset platforms, this matters even more because regulatory status can be complicated.
A firm may be registered for one activity but not another. It may be licensed in one jurisdiction but not another. It may hold money-transmission licenses without being an investment adviser. Details matter.
The SEC’s case is a reminder that regulatory credibility can be manufactured — and investors need to check before trusting it.
This article is based on SEC Press Release 2026-148 and related enforcement materials.
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $201.9 million in net outflows for the August 28 session, ending a nine-day inflow streak and giving traders a cooler signal after a strong run of ETF demand.
The outflow marks a shift from the prior sessions, when spot Bitcoin ETF demand had been one of the cleaner supports for market sentiment. ETF flows are not the whole Bitcoin market, but they have become one of the most visible measures of regulated investor appetite.
That makes the break in the streak important.
It does not mean institutional demand has vanished. It does mean the market can no longer point to uninterrupted daily ETF inflows as a short-term tailwind.
For more details, visit the official Farside platform.
ETF flow streaks shape sentiment.
When funds take in money day after day, traders interpret it as steady demand from regulated investors. That can support price, improve confidence, and give bulls a simple narrative: institutional capital is still buying.
When the streak breaks, that narrative becomes less clean.
A single outflow day does not erase previous inflows. It does not mean long-term holders are leaving. But it does show that ETF demand can pause, reverse, or become more tactical.
That matters during volatile market periods.
The $201.9 million figure is a single-session net outflow.
It should not be confused with cumulative ETF assets, long-term product demand, or total institutional positioning. Daily flow data can swing based on portfolio rebalancing, basis trades, macro positioning, profit-taking, or fund-specific movements.
That is why one day should not be overread.
The more important question is whether the outflow becomes a trend. If the next few sessions return to inflows, August 28 may look like a pause. If outflows continue, the market may begin to reassess near-term demand.
ETF flows are important, but they are not everything.
Bitcoin demand also comes from spot exchanges, corporate treasuries, derivatives positioning, miners, long-term holders, retail buyers, and global macro demand. ETF outflows can pressure sentiment, but they do not define the entire market.
Still, ETFs matter because they represent the most visible traditional-market channel.
That visibility is why traders track them closely.
ETF outflows can happen for many reasons.
Investors may take profits after a rally. Institutions may rebalance at month-end. Hedge funds may unwind basis trades. Macro concerns may reduce risk appetite. Some outflows may also be fund-specific rather than category-wide.
Without overclaiming the cause, the timing matters.
The outflow came after several positive sessions, meaning some investors may have decided to reduce exposure into strength or ahead of fresh macro uncertainty.
Bitcoin ETF demand has not disappeared, but the uninterrupted inflow story has paused.
That is the practical signal from August 28. The market now needs to see whether regulated demand resumes or whether the outflow marks the start of a softer period.
Traders will watch the next sessions closely.
If inflows return quickly, the broader ETF bull case remains intact. If outflows deepen, Bitcoin may lose one of its clearest short-term support narratives.
For now, the nine-day streak is over, and that gives the market something new to price.
This article is based on public spot Bitcoin ETF flow data from Farside Investors.
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
Ripple’s cross-border token has declined by nearly 7% over the past week, yet numerous analysts remain optimistic that a renewed uptrend could be on the horizon.
Many believe the price could shift into an “up-only” phase from here, while others expect a substantial pullback before any major increase.
As of press time, XRP trades at around $1.38 (per CoinGecko), boasting a market capitalization of approximately $86 billion. While the current level marks a clear drop from the local top seen earlier in August, Ali Martinez still views it as a constructive development.
The popular analyst observed the asset’s price action and assumed that the breakout was confirmed after XRP supposedly “cleared resistance.” He thinks the next target is $1.70.
Shortly after, Martinez touched on the token again, praising the solid institutional interest, which signals “a notable increase in demand.” Spot XRP ETFs have indeed attracted significant capital lately. Last week, for instance, the inflows exceeded $110 million for the first time since December, 2025. Moreover, the ETFs have recorded nine consecutive green days, something last observed eight months ago.

Other analysts recently making XRP bets include X users Diana and XRP Update. The former claimed that the asset currently sits directly on the $1.38 support and the next Elliot wave targets point to a short-term surge to $1.88 and an eventual explosion to $7.07.
“There’s another interesting signal on the 4H chart: RSI has recovered to roughly 47.5 and moved back ABOVE its signal line near 44.7. That means momentum is attempting to turn bullish again while XRP is STILL sitting near support – very different from chasing the move when RSI was above 80,” the analyst added.
For their part, XRP Update opined that the token has broken out of a downtrend and could now be gearing up for a wild rally toward $2.50, $3.50, $6, and finally $13.
It is important to note that some analysts, like Crypto Lens, expect XRP to tumble before posting new gains. In their view, the asset may first retreat to $1.17, then begin a new bull run toward $1.90, $3.10, and $5.20. For their part, ChartNerd opined that XRP failed to reclaim its 50-week EMA for the second week in a row.
“I warned that consecutive weekly closes below the 50 could trigger a deeper correction, and we have retraced 22% thus far. The 20 EMA sits below as a short-term support floor ($1.27),” they added.
The post Ripple (XRP) Breakout Confirmed? Analyst Sets the Next Big Target appeared first on CryptoPotato.
A sharp contrast has emerged in active addresses across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tron, and Cardano, as the four blockchains continue to show different patterns when it comes to network usage.
Bitcoin’s count, for one, has dropped significantly compared with previous major cycles, even though its price remains far above historical levels. According to the latest observation by Alphractal founder Joao Wedson, this does not necessarily indicate weaker usage.
Bitcoin investors now tend to hold for longer and move coins less frequently, while ETFs, custodians, exchanges, and the Lightning Network are being used more often. The growing role of ETFs is particularly notable, as US-based spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds have recorded $3.31 billion in inflows so far in August. This shift in how investors access and hold BTC could help explain why on-chain activity is not increasing at the same pace as the asset’s price.
Rather than indicating that the crypto asset is necessarily being used less, the trend may reflect its growing role as a reserve asset, as more activity takes place through financial products and other structures instead of directly on the blockchain.
Ethereum’s network activity has once again begun to accelerate, and active addresses are now close to reaching 1 million, even with a significant share of the ecosystem operating on Layer 2 networks. Such a trend evidences that the asset remains highly relevant as financial infrastructure.
Meanwhile, Tron was found to have recorded more than 4 million active addresses, which makes it the strongest case among the four networks by this measure. According to Wedson, much of its activity appears to be driven by payments and stablecoins, particularly USDT, rather than simply speculation around TRX’s price. The network has become a major infrastructure layer for transferring digital dollars.
The same cannot be said for Cardano, which has witnessed its activity fall sharply since 2021 and remains at very low levels compared with its own history. Wedson explained that price can increase because of narratives, liquidity, and speculation, while on-chain activity offers a clearer indication of whether people are actually using a blockchain.
Cardano’s weak activity comes after years of criticism over the network’s slow development and its struggle to turn its technology into broader usage. More recently, the network has come under tremendous pressure, including a public warning from founder Charles Hoskinson about a “wave of failures” and closures of important dApps.
On the price side of things, ADA briefly reached $0.254 this month, before pulling back to $0.196 at the time of writing. Despite the recent weakness in price, market commentators remain optimistic. One such analyst, Sssebi, said that he expects the ADA to return to its previous all-time high of $3.10 during the coming bull market and believes it could push above that level.
The post Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tron, and Cardano Tell Four Very Different Stories Through Active Addresses appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Bitcoin traded at $78,500 as the Japanese yen breached 160 per dollar in Tokyo trading, while a U.S. strike on Iran’s Larak Island added to bearish price prediction. The moves followed Friday’s broad dollar advance and hawkish remarks from Warsh at Jackson Hole, which lifted expectations for a Federal Reserve rate hike.
Bitcoin’s daily loss remained under 1% even as the strike in Iran lifted oil prices and pushed stocks lower. The market focus was whether bitcoin could hold near $78,000 amid yen weakness, higher rate expectations, and rising geopolitical risk.
The month’s closing ETF total was also in focus as a measure of whether an eight-day bitcoin ETF inflow run continued through the change in rate expectations.

Bitcoin ETF Flows, Coinglass
Bond investors had been pricing a Fed positioned to hike, and the repricing had pulled institutional money out of Bitcoin ETFs across May and June. Monday was the final trading session of August, making the month’s closing ETF total a closely watched signal for whether the eight-day inflow run survived the shift in rate expectations.
August’s closing ETF flow total is the more immediate crypto-market indicator. The data offered a read on institutional appetite as bitcoin traded near $78,000 amid competing market pressures.
EXPLORE: Best Crypto Presales With Asymmetric Upside in the Current Market
The first force is currency stress. The yen has long been used as a funding currency for investments in U.S. stocks and Treasury notes, placing its movement near intervention-sensitive levels alongside broader market positioning.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that recent yen moves had been contained and did not warrant a joint U.S.-Japan intervention like the one seen the previous month. Bessent had warned Friday that a disorderly yen market could feed through to higher U.S. interest rates, linking Tokyo’s currency market to Wall Street’s rate outlook.

The second force is the repricing of rate expectations following Warsh’s hawkish Jackson Hole remarks. The third is geopolitical: Reuters reported that U.S. forces struck Iran’s Larak Island on Sunday and that oil rose as Gulf tensions flared.
Reuters has also reported that flows of crude and refined products through the Strait of Hormuz, which averaged about 18 million barrels per day before the conflict, fell to 4.8 million bpd in July and averaged around 2 million bpd so far in August, according to Kpler. The report said traders were increasingly treating disruptions to Middle East energy supplies as a new reality rather than a temporary shock.

Reuters reported that investors were turning to upcoming U.S. data, including the nonfarm payrolls report and consumer inflation figures, which could shape expectations ahead of the September Fed meeting. August’s closing ETF flow total remained the more immediate crypto-market indicator.
The dollar’s direction, the yen’s movement near intervention-sensitive levels, and the path of rate expectations remain key variables for risk assets, including bitcoin.
Bitcoin’s sub-1% daily decline came as the yen breached 160 per dollar, rate-hike expectations increased, and Gulf tensions flared. Cryptonews characterized bitcoin’s response to the Iran-related market moves as comparatively muted, while the broader crypto market showed mixed performance.
Follow 99Bitcoins on X For the Latest Market Updates and Subscribe on YouTube For Daily Expert Market Analysis.
The post Bitcoin Price Prediction: Macro Pressure Mounts as Yen Slides and Oil Climbs appeared first on 99Bitcoins.
In the latest Tron Crypto news, Brazil’s National Council of the Public Ministry, known by its Portuguese acronym CNMP, held a two-day training program in Brasília on August 26 and 27, 2026, focused on the investigation, recovery, custody, management and disposal of cryptoassets.
The program, Do Rastro ao Resultado: Cooperação para Recuperação e Custódia de Criptoativos, brought together prosecutors, magistrates, law-enforcement personnel, public officials and specialists, including representatives of Tron and Tether, according to CNMP.
The program was organized by the CNMP’s Institutional Activity to Combat Organized Crime, a unit linked to the council’s presidency. CNMP said the initiative was intended to promote an exchange of knowledge and best practices among institutions and specialists working on investigations and the recovery, management and disposal of cryptoassets, while strengthening interinstitutional cooperation against crime involving virtual assets.
CNMP prorroga inscrições para capacitação sobre cooperação para recuperação e custódia de criptoativos https://t.co/Df6yFuCrGC pic.twitter.com/xA54swko9J
— CNMP (@cnmp_oficial) August 21, 2026
The August 26 program featured four panels and was open to public officials involved in criminal enforcement, authorities, police agents and civil servants. The August 27 sessions were restricted to invited guests. CNMP said simultaneous translation would be available, and registration for the first day was available through the council’s events system until August 20.
The published agenda covered the blockchain ecosystem; cross-sector cooperation for freezing, seizing and returning assets; custody models for virtual assets; and the public management of seized virtual assets.
It also included sessions on anti-money-laundering prevention and sanctions in a cross-border setting, as well as anti-money-laundering and know-your-customer tools aimed at combating the financing of terrorist organizations in Brazil’s national financial system.

CNMP listed Brazil’s financial-intelligence unit Coaf, the Ministry of Justice and Public Security, and the Central Bank of Brazil among the participating institutions. The private-sector participants listed by the council included the Digital Currencies Governance Group, Tron, Tether, Ledger and Crystal Intelligence.
CNMP’s later coverage of the event described an opening presentation on the blockchain ecosystem by a Tron representative. The presentation addressed blockchain fundamentals, the Tron Network and the role of decentralized autonomous organizations, as well as secure cryptoasset custody, regulatory challenges and cooperation between public institutions and the industry.
TRON joined DCGG and Brazil’s National Council of the Public Ministry in Brasília for two days of discussions focused on digital assets, stablecoins, and blockchain transparency.
More details from @TheBlockCo
https://t.co/wthvV3WIeW pic.twitter.com/WMRymlvx2o
— TRON DAO (@trondao) August 29, 2026
The training focused on the operational steps between identifying a cryptoasset trail and securing an investigative result. CNMP described that process as involving the location of assets, the ability to freeze and seize them, secure custody, and their subsequent management and disposal.
The agenda also included a Ledger-device configuration workshop and a workshop on risk tolerance for blocking assets and case studies. Through the two-day program, CNMP brought together public authorities and industry specialists to discuss the technical and institutional issues involved in the investigation, recovery and custody of virtual assets.
EXCLUSIVE: Unlock High leverage Options of Up to 100x On MargexEXPLORE: Best Crypto Presales With Asymmetric Upside in the Current Market
The post Brazilian Prosecutors Just Trained Alongside Tron and Tether on How to Seize Crypto appeared first on 99Bitcoins.
Russia's crypto regulation may enhance digital asset legitimacy, potentially stabilizing the market and influencing global crypto sentiment.
The post Russia’s crypto regulation takes effect, boosting oversight and legitimacy appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
The escalation in missile attacks heightens geopolitical tensions, influencing market perceptions and increasing uncertainty about future conflicts.
The post Russia launches nighttime missile attacks on Kyiv, killing at least four appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
ICE will invest in tZERO and license its blockchain patents as both firms develop infrastructure for NYSE’s planned tokenized market.
Ireland has excluded crypto and derivatives from tax-advantaged investment accounts due to the launch in 2027, while allowing listed stocks, bonds, ETFs and retail investment funds. Ireland’s Department of Finance said in its retail investment roadmap that crypto assets and…
Everlodge Crypto acts like a safe for digital treasures, with each coin representing a unique, securely kept piece of…
The post What Is Everlodge Crypto appeared first on Coinlabz.
The post What is Solana and how does it work? appeared first on Coinlabz.
ChainCatcher 消息,风险投资人 Tomasz Tunguz 在 X 发文称,前沿 AI 市场正分化为封闭阵营,实验室选择合作伙伴、切断竞争对手并配给最强模型访问。Salesforce 选择 Anthropic 作为专用 AI 合作伙伴,使 Claude 成为全球最大 CRM 与 Slack 的默认模型。OpenAI 在 SpaceX 收购 Cursor 后于 11 月 12 日切断其 API 访问。Z.ai 将旗舰模型置于累计营收超 100 亿美元主机的安全审查之后。Anthropic 通过 Project Glasswing 配给 Mythos...
10億人超へ数週間かけ段階展開 メッセージングアプリ「テレグラム(Telegram)」上で、ネイティブのノンカストディアル(自己管理型)暗号資産(仮想通貨)ウォレット「グラムウォレット(Gram Wallet)」の提供が […]
The post บาคาร่าออนไลน์ เว็บตรง อันดับ 1 เล่นบาคาร่าสด ปลอดภัย จ่ายจริง appeared first on https://dumbbell-exercises.com/.
The post บาคาร่าทุนน้อย เล่นยังไงให้ได้กำไร รวมเทคนิคทำเงินที่มือใหม่ต้องรู้ appeared first on https://dumbbell-exercises.com/.

BNB has remained one of the strongest large-cap assets in the crypto market, with the token recently trading around the $600–$610 area. The short-term structure has been relatively constructive, although BNB is now approaching an important resistance zone where buyers will need to demonstrate stronger momentum. Recent market data places resistance around $615–$620, while the $600 area has emerged as an important psychological and technical support level. (CoinStats)
Beyond price action, BNB has an increasingly important fundamental story. BNB Chain continues to expand across decentralized finance, stablecoins, real-world assets and artificial-intelligence applications, while the network’s 2026 roadmap focuses on improving speed, efficiency, security and scalability. (BNB Chain)
BNB’s recent movement has been relatively measured rather than explosive. After recovering toward the $600 region, the token has been consolidating close to resistance.
The immediate technical picture can be divided into three important zones:
Resistance: $615–$620
A decisive breakout above this area would improve the short-term structure and could attract momentum buyers. The most important factor would be confirmation through stronger trading volume rather than a brief intraday move above resistance.
Support: $600–$603
The $600 region is currently an important psychological level. Holding above it would suggest that buyers continue to defend the recent recovery. Recent market analysis has identified roughly $603–$605 as near-term support. (CoinStats)
Deeper support
If BNB loses the $600 area decisively, traders could start looking toward lower support zones. A sustained breakdown would weaken the current recovery structure and could lead to additional profit-taking.
For now, the market remains in a battle between buyers attempting to push BNB higher and sellers defending the $615–$620 region.
Recent market data shows BNB has been relatively resilient compared with several major altcoins. One recent report noted that BNB had gained roughly 8% over seven days, supported by increased activity on BNB Smart Chain and growing DeFi adoption. (CryptoRank)
Another recent market update showed BNB around $602, with the token having gained approximately 1.9% over seven days at that point. The pullback was attributed partly to broader crypto-market liquidations and leveraged long unwinding. (tradingkey.com)
This is important because BNB’s recent behavior suggests that buyers remain interested, but the market is not yet experiencing the kind of aggressive momentum that would make a breakout certain.
One of the strongest arguments for BNB comes from the activity taking place on its underlying ecosystem.
BNB Chain currently reports approximately 2.85 million daily active users, around $4.87 billion in total value locked, roughly $2.5 billion in trading volume, and very low average gas costs on its ecosystem dashboard. (BNB Chain)
These numbers highlight an important part of the BNB investment thesis: the token is not supported only by exchange-related demand. BNB is also deeply integrated into an expanding blockchain ecosystem.
BNB is used for transaction fees, ecosystem applications, staking-related functions and other activities across BNB Chain. As network usage expands, demand for the underlying ecosystem can become increasingly important for the long-term value proposition of the token.
Real-world assets are another area where BNB Chain has been gaining traction.
Recent reports indicate that the number of wallets holding tokenized real-world assets on BNB Chain has surpassed 300,000. This represents a significant milestone for the network’s RWA ecosystem and shows that blockchain adoption is expanding beyond traditional crypto-native applications. (Altcoin Buzz)
The growth of tokenized assets could become increasingly important over the next several years.
If more traditional financial assets move on-chain, networks that can provide inexpensive transactions, deep liquidity and high throughput could benefit from this expansion. BNB Chain is positioning itself to compete for that activity.
Artificial intelligence has become one of the biggest themes across crypto, and BNB Chain is increasingly targeting this sector.
According to BNB Chain, more than 200,000 AI agents were registered on BNB Smart Chain under the ERC-8004 standard as of July 2026. The network says this represented roughly 60% of registered agents across 26 networks at that time. (BNB Chain)
The ecosystem is also working on an AI-agent marketplace designed to improve the discoverability and usability of these applications.
This could become a significant long-term narrative for BNB if AI agents begin generating meaningful on-chain transaction activity.
However, investors should distinguish between registration numbers and actual economic activity. A large number of AI agents does not automatically mean equivalent demand for BNB. Sustained user activity, transactions, fees and liquidity will ultimately matter more.
BNB Chain’s 2026 technical roadmap places significant emphasis on scalability, efficiency and reliability.
The network has stated that its 2025 performance was built around priorities including speed, cost efficiency, reliability and fairness, while continuing to support growth in areas such as trading, stablecoins and real-world assets. (BNB Chain)
The broader roadmap also includes efforts to increase throughput and improve the handling of application traffic.
Separately, BNB Chain is developing a new Layer-1 architecture designed specifically for agentic trading, with a target of sub-50-millisecond transaction preconfirmation and no public mempool. The project is targeting a testnet toward the end of 2026 and mainnet deployment in early 2027. (The Block)
If successfully delivered, this could position the BNB ecosystem for a new category of high-frequency, AI-driven on-chain applications.
Security remains one of the most important issues for any blockchain ecosystem.
BNB Chain recently expanded its AvengerDAO security program, bringing together 11 security firms and offering services covering security assessments, monitoring, incident response and bug bounties. (BNB Chain)
This is more important than it may initially appear.
As BNB Chain attracts more capital, stablecoins, tokenized assets and applications, the cost of security failures becomes increasingly significant. Stronger security infrastructure can help improve confidence among developers, users and institutional participants.
A safer ecosystem does not guarantee a higher BNB price, but it can strengthen the network’s long-term fundamentals.
Another development traders are watching is the planned Pasteur hard fork.
Recent reports indicate that the upgrade is expected around August 25, 2026, with improvements aimed at areas including bridge security and validator-related controls. (CryptoRank)
Network upgrades can create short-term interest in a token because traders often anticipate improved functionality and ecosystem growth.
However, the actual long-term impact will depend on implementation and adoption. An upgrade is fundamentally bullish only if it translates into better network performance, greater usage and stronger economic activity.
BNB’s supply dynamics are another important part of the story.
BNB has a long-standing token-burn mechanism that removes tokens from circulation over time. At the same time, BNB is required across various parts of the Binance and BNB Chain ecosystem.
This creates an interesting supply-demand structure.
If ecosystem usage grows while the effective supply continues to be reduced through burns, the fundamental setup can become increasingly supportive over the long term.
Still, token burns should not be viewed in isolation. Price ultimately depends on the balance between actual demand, circulating supply, market liquidity and investor sentiment.
From a technical perspective, the first major confirmation would be a sustained move above the $615–$620 resistance zone.
A convincing breakout would ideally come with:
If these conditions align, BNB could enter a stronger momentum phase.
The market would then begin looking toward higher resistance levels rather than repeatedly testing the $600 region.
The biggest short-term warning sign would be a decisive breakdown below $600.
A failure to hold this psychological level could indicate that sellers are gaining control. The risk would become greater if the breakdown occurs alongside rising volume and broad weakness across the cryptocurrency market.
Another risk is excessive leverage.
Recent data has shown that leveraged positioning can contribute to sharp BNB pullbacks when traders are forced to close long positions. (tradingkey.com)
Therefore, even if the broader fundamentals remain positive, BNB can experience significant short-term volatility.
BNB’s performance should also be evaluated relative to Bitcoin and Ethereum.
Bitcoin continues to dictate much of the overall direction of the crypto market. When BTC enters a strong uptrend, capital generally becomes more willing to rotate into large-cap altcoins.
BNB can benefit from this environment because it combines large market capitalization with an active blockchain ecosystem.
However, if Bitcoin experiences a sharp correction, even strong BNB fundamentals may not be enough to prevent short-term selling.
This is why the BTC trend remains one of the most important external variables for BNB.
The current BNB setup can best be described as constructive but awaiting confirmation.
The $600 region remains an important support area, while $615–$620 is the key short-term resistance zone. A breakout above resistance with strong volume would significantly improve the bullish case.
At the fundamental level, the picture is encouraging. BNB Chain is expanding across DeFi, real-world assets and AI applications, while continuing to work on scalability and security. The network is also preparing for additional technical upgrades and a longer-term architecture designed for emerging use cases such as agentic trading. (BNB Chain)
The challenge is converting ecosystem growth into sustained demand for BNB.
BNB is entering an interesting phase.
The token is trading near a critical technical area, while the underlying BNB Chain ecosystem continues to expand. Network activity, RWA adoption, AI development, security improvements and upcoming infrastructure upgrades provide several potential catalysts for the long-term story.
In the short term, however, price action remains king.
A clean breakout above $615–$620 could signal that buyers are ready to push BNB into a new upward phase. Conversely, losing the $600 support zone would weaken the setup and could trigger another round of selling.
For traders, the most important things to watch are $600 support, $615–$620 resistance, volume, leverage and Bitcoin’s overall direction.
For long-term investors, the bigger question is whether BNB Chain can continue turning its growing user base, DeFi activity, RWA adoption and emerging AI ecosystem into sustainable economic demand.
BNB remains one of the most important large-cap altcoins to watch, but the next major move will need confirmation from both price and fundamentals.
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and is not financial advice. Cryptocurrency prices are highly volatile, and market conditions can change rapidly.

Ethereum (ETH) remains one of the most closely watched assets in the cryptocurrency market. After a period of significant volatility, ETH has been attempting to stabilize and rebuild momentum. Recent market data places ETH around the $1,900 area in early August, although intraday prices can move quickly in the crypto market. (Reddit)
The recent price action suggests that Ethereum is trying to establish a base after its earlier decline. ETH has been trading in a relatively tight range around the $1,900–$1,915 region in recent sessions, with trading activity moderating compared with the stronger volumes seen during previous moves. (Reddit)
For bulls, the most important development would be a sustained move above the recent resistance zone. A breakout supported by stronger volume could signal that buyers are gaining control and potentially open the door toward higher resistance levels.
On the other hand, failure to hold the current trading range could bring renewed selling pressure. Traders should therefore focus on confirmation rather than assuming that every short-term bounce represents the beginning of a major rally.
Ethereum has faced several challenges during this market cycle. ETH has underperformed Bitcoin significantly, while the ETH/BTC ratio has remained under pressure. Earlier research highlighted that Ethereum’s drawdown from its 2025 high was considerably larger than Bitcoin’s, showing how much weaker ETH’s relative performance had become. (DHLm Studio)
One important issue is value capture. Ethereum’s Layer-2 ecosystem has expanded rapidly, but greater activity on Layer-2 networks can also reduce the amount of activity and fees directly captured by Ethereum’s mainnet.
At the same time, this scaling strategy has produced major benefits for users. Research published in 2026 found that Ethereum’s upgrades had substantially increased throughput across the mainnet and Layer-2 ecosystem while median transaction fees had fallen sharply. (arXiv)
This creates an interesting long-term trade-off: Ethereum is becoming cheaper and more scalable, but investors are still assessing how that growth translates into value for ETH itself.
Ethereum’s investment case is not based purely on price speculation. The network remains a major infrastructure layer for decentralized finance, stablecoins, tokenized assets and smart contracts.
Network revenue data also shows that stablecoin transfers remain an important source of Ethereum activity. A 2026 market review found that stablecoin transfers represented the largest share of Ethereum Layer-1 revenue among the sectors analyzed. (Kraken)
This matters because sustained real-world usage can provide a stronger foundation for ETH demand than speculative trading alone.
Another factor worth watching is institutional exposure to ETH.
Corporate Ethereum holdings grew substantially during 2025, with companies building ETH treasury strategies and treating the asset as a longer-term balance-sheet holding. (Business Standard)
The thesis is different from simply holding cash. ETH can potentially provide staking rewards while also giving institutions exposure to Ethereum’s broader ecosystem.
However, corporate accumulation should not automatically be interpreted as a guarantee of higher prices. These strategies can change with market conditions, financing costs and investor sentiment.
From a technical perspective, ETH traders should focus on three broad areas:
1. Current support zone
The $1,900 region has recently acted as an important area of price consolidation. Holding this zone would help maintain the short-term recovery structure.
2. Psychological resistance
The $2,000 level is an important psychological barrier. A convincing move above it could improve market sentiment and attract additional momentum traders.
3. Higher resistance
If ETH successfully breaks above $2,000 and establishes support there, the market could begin testing higher resistance zones. The strength of volume will be important because a breakout without meaningful participation can quickly turn into a false move.
Several factors could strengthen the bullish case:
A combination of these factors would provide a much stronger signal than price appreciation alone.
There are also several risks.
Bitcoin continues to influence the direction of the broader crypto market, meaning a major BTC correction could put pressure on ETH regardless of Ethereum’s own fundamentals.
Ethereum also faces intense competition from other blockchain ecosystems. Lower transaction costs and faster networks are positive for users, but Ethereum must continue attracting developers, liquidity and applications to maintain its position.
Finally, macroeconomic conditions remain important. Higher interest rates, tighter liquidity and weaker risk appetite can reduce demand for volatile assets such as cryptocurrencies.
Ethereum’s current setup is best viewed as a recovery attempt rather than a confirmed new bull trend.
The recent stabilization around the $1,900 area is encouraging, but ETH needs to reclaim important psychological and technical resistance with stronger volume before the bullish case becomes more convincing.
The most important question is not simply whether ETH can move higher for a few days. The bigger question is whether Ethereum can convert its growing ecosystem, scaling improvements and institutional interest into sustained demand for ETH.
If buyers successfully reclaim major resistance and the broader crypto market remains supportive, ETH could enter a stronger recovery phase. If resistance continues to hold and volume remains weak, consolidation or another retest of lower support levels remains possible.
Ethereum remains one of the most important assets in the digital-asset ecosystem, but its price recovery faces both opportunities and challenges.
The short-term picture depends heavily on price structure, volume and Bitcoin’s direction. The longer-term picture depends on Ethereum’s ability to maintain its dominance in DeFi, stablecoins, tokenization and smart-contract infrastructure while ensuring that network growth translates into meaningful value for ETH.
For traders, the key is confirmation. For long-term investors, the more important story may be whether Ethereum’s expanding ecosystem can continue generating sustainable demand over time.
As always, cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile, and technical levels can change quickly. This article is for educational purposes and should not be considered financial advice.
The new report maps the illicit and legitimate uses of crypto privacy tools, drawing on data from TRM Labs, Chainalysis, the RAND Corporation, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Statista, and U.S. Treasury Department disclosures. It argues that the current regulatory focus is aimed at the wrong layer of the transaction stack.
In early 2026, Polygon Labs announced $250 million in acquisitions of Coinme and Sequence to expand its stablecoin payments infrastructure. Coinme provides licensed US fiat on- and off-ramps with a nationwide retail footprint, while Sequence adds enterprise wallet infrastructure and one-click cross-chain transaction capabilities. Together, these additions strengthen Polygon’s position in regulated, production-grade stablecoin payments.
Caroline Crenshaw’s departure from the SEC on January 2 marks a turning point for crypto regulation in Washington. The longtime cryptocurrency skeptic’s exit leaves the commission operating under a 3-0 Republican majority—a historic shift that clears the way for Paul Atkins’ pro-innovation agenda to move forward without meaningful internal opposition.
Crenshaw spent over a decade at SEC agency, consistently raising concerns about cryptocurrencies, digital assets and investor protection.
Her exit coincides with the broader regulatory reorganization under the Trump administration, which has explicitly positioned itself to make the U.S. the “crypto capital of the world.”
The commission now operates with fewer members than authorized, as Trump hasn’t yet filled the vacant seats—a strategic pause that effectively gives the Republican-majority commissioners free rein on policy.
The timing couldn’t be sharper. SEC Chair Paul Atkins has already signaled plans to introduce an “innovation exemption” that would let crypto startups test new products under lighter regulatory requirements, provided they meet basic consumer protections. [3][7] That proposal was expected within 30 days of December 2, meaning it could arrive any moment. With Crenshaw gone, there’s no institutional voice pushing back on the exemption’s scope or implementation details.
The broader regulatory picture is also shifting. The Senate is scheduled to hold hearings in January on the CLARITY Act—landmark legislation designed to end years of turf warfare between the SEC and CFTC by clearly dividing jurisdiction over different crypto products. [3][7] White House crypto adviser David Sacks said in December the bill is “closer to passage than at any point in the past.” [3] These aren’t minor procedural tweaks. They represent a fundamental reordering of how Washington approaches digital assets.
The real action starts immediately. Watch for the innovation exemption announcement—it could drop with minimal fanfare. Then track the Senate hearings on CLARITY in January. If that bill moves to a floor vote and passes, the crypto industry will have concrete answers about regulatory jurisdiction for the first time in years. Markets have been pricing in regulatory clarity for months. Crenshaw’s departure removes one of the last obstacles to delivering on it.
The post SEC’s Pro-Crypto Shift Accelerates as Key Skeptic Crenshaw Exits appeared first on The Coins Post.
PEPE just ripped 26% higher on January 2, hitting $0.000005106 as trading volume exploded past $800 million.
That’s no thin pump—retail’s back, Robinhood holders sitting on 8.3% of supply, and a Hyperliquid whale named James Wynn dropped a bombshell prediction: $69 billion market cap by end-2026. If you’re trading memes, this is your wake-up call. Why now? New year FOMO meets bold calls in a market where BTC chills at $88k.

PEPE’s ERC-20 on Ethereum. No fancy DeFi twist here—just pure meme liquidity. Volume spiked 370-400% in 24 hours, open interest jumped 82% to $446.5 million on derivatives. RSI hit 67, screaming bullish momentum after breaking $0.0000042 resistance.
Whales aren’t dumping. That official “We ride at dawn” tweet lit socials on fire—crypto Twitter’s buzzing. Supply’s fixed at 420.69 trillion tokens. If Wynn’s right, that’s $0.000164 per PEPE. Math checks out. But Ethereum gas? Still a killer for small trades.
Total crypto cap up 1.07% to $2.99T. BTC +1.21% at $88,765, dominance slipping to 59.22%—alts eating its lunch. PEPE led top gainers, outpacing Story (+25%) and Mog. Volumes hit $164B market-wide. No massive liqs reported, but meme sector OI surging means leveraged degens are in.
BTC’s post-halving year ended red for first time ever—down 6% in 2025 despite $126k ATH. ETFs pulled $348M, but macro liquidity rules now. PEPE doesn’t care—it’s riding retail hype while big boys consolidate.
James Wynn, that Hyperliquid ser, straight-up said PEPE hits top meme status like SHIB did last cycle—if bull market holds. “We ride at dawn” from @pepe went viral. Community’s pumping: “PEPE to the moon” threads everywhere. No official team—it’s anon dev vibes.
Exchanges? Volumes exploding on Binance, MEXC. No rugs spotted. Traders on X calling for $0.000026 ATH retest. Sarcasm alert: Great timing for memes while BTC whales accumulate quietly. Holders care about flips, not halving myths.
But is this sustainable? Meme pumps fade fast.
Don’t get rekt. PEPE’s been rugged before—no premine, but watch whale wallets. Use hardware for big bags; software wallets fine for sub-$1k. Check Etherscan for suspicious transfers. Avoid leverage over 5x—OI spike means liqs incoming on pullbacks.
Actionable: Set stops below $0.0000042. DCA if you believe Wynn. DYOR on Hyperliquid perps for leverage without CEX KYC. Phishing’s rampant post-pumps—double-check links. If you’re aping memes, keep it under 5% portfolio. Skin in the game matters, but don’t YOLO rent money.
$0.000005 close today flips structure fully bullish. Watch BTC dominance drop—alts feast. Wynn’s $69B? Ballsy. If ETH L2s cut fees, PEPE volumes could 10x. Macro: Fed liquidity print January 2nd might juice risk assets.
Pullback to $0.0000045? Buy dip. Break $0.000006? Targets $0.00001 easy. Meme season back? You tell me. Trade smart—2026’s rewriting rules.
The post PEPE Explodes 26% in 24 Hours—James Wynn Calls $69B Market Cap by Year-End, Meme Degens Pile In appeared first on The Coins Post.
The market is on its next stage post-recovery as the majority of investors are witnessing a mini-correction before continuation.
Hyperliquid Labs is in advanced talks with Kraken parent Payward to bring its popular perpetual futures products to US traders through regulated derivatives venue Bitnomial.

‘Operation Lighthouse’ went after child sex abuse materials, working with law enforcement to round up more than 14,000 investigative leads.


Operation Lighthouse generated 14,300 investigative leads across 11 crypto exchanges and payment services and flagged over 7,700 suspect accounts.
Blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis said a global operation it led identified more than 7,700 suspect accounts linked to child sexual abuse material (CSAM).
According to a Tuesday press release shared with Cointelegraph, Operation Lighthouse investigated 29,120 crypto addresses and digital identifiers connected to over 100 CSAM platforms, forums and distribution networks across the surface and dark web.
The operation also generated 14,300 investigative leads across 11 crypto exchanges and payment services and flagged suspects across 125 countries. Among the suspects identified were 16 registered sex offenders.
Read more
Robinhood Chain is putting up some eye-catching numbers, with single-day DEX trading volume hitting a record US$989 million (AU$1.3 billion) last week. Total value locked has climbed to an all-time high of US$708 million (AU$987.7 million), almost doubling month-on-month, while stablecoin supply has reached roughly US$770 million (AU$1.07 billion), up 47% over the same period.
But the bigger story is that activity on the chain is changing. July was heavily driven by memecoin speculation, particularly around CASHCAT and its eventual Robinhood spot listing. In August, however, attention increasingly shifted towards utility, infrastructure and new token models.
Read more: Ripple Prepares XRP Ledger for a Post-Quantum Future
PONS, one of the chain’s leading launchpads, saw its market capitalisation jump from around US$20 million (AU$27.9 million) to more than US$200 million (AU$279 million) during August. Other projects, including liquidity protocol Delta, emissions project UP and bonding platform NetNet, also saw their valuations rise more than tenfold.
Meanwhile, tokenised stocks remain Robinhood Chain’s key differentiator. LONG, another major launchpad, has helped fuel memecoins paired against tokenised equities.
Artificial Inu (AI), paired with tokenised NVDA, surged from a US$1.5 million (AU$2.09 million) market cap at the start of August to a US$135 million (AU$193.9 million) peak, with its NVDA liquidity pool now significantly deeper than its WETH pool. Memecoins paired with tokenised stocks now account for roughly a quarter of the chain’s stock-linked trading volume.
In mid-August Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev said in a CNBC interview that he believes tokenisation will dominate the entire financial system. He called it the “tokenisation supercycle” and said it’s the “best path” to make the US financial system future proof in an always-on model.
Read more: Robinhood Chain Nears $1B DEX Volume as TVL and Stablecoin Liquidity Surge
The post Robinhood Chain Nears $1B DEX Volume as TVL and Stablecoin Liquidity Surge appeared first on Crypto News Australia.
As we wrote several times last week, analysts are currently following the crypto market closely to see whether there are signs the bear market is over. However, one analyst, CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju, has made up his mind. On X (formerly Twitter), he posted:
Ki Young Ju says Bitcoin’s 2026 bear market is over after CryptoQuant’s market-cycle indicator turned positive for the first time since October. The shift suggests Bitcoin investors are moving back into profit, signalling that the broader downtrend may have run its course.
His comments come after Bitcoin rallied from just around US$64K (A$89.3K) less than two weeks ago. It has since made gains of over 23%, trading as high as US$80,652 (AU$112,530) last Friday. At the time of writing, BTC is struggling with the US$80K (AU$111.6K) mark, currently trading at US$77,831 (AU$108,594).
Other large assets have also rallied. Ethereum gained 29% over the past month, while XRP gained 27% and Solana 40%. BTC, ETH, XRP and SOL are all currently trading flat or slightly in the red.
Read more: Solana Activity Hits Record as Validators Weigh $1.5B Supply Cut
Meanwhile, the US Bitcoin spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have recorded outflows for the first time in almost two trading weeks. After pulling in US$3.04 billion (AU$4.24 billion) over nine trading days, the trend reversed last Friday. 28 August saw US$201.9 million (AU$281.7 million) in outflows.
Ark’s ARKB saw the largest net outflows with US$114.9 million (AU$160.3 million), followed by Bitwise’s BITB with US$49.7 million (AU$69.3 million) and BlackRock’s IBIT with US$33.4 million (AU$46.6 million).
Ethereum ETFs, however, continued their run of ten consecutive days with net inflows. Friday alone added US$102.1 million (AU$142.5 million) to the funds. Over the past two weeks, that’s a total of US$1.5 billion (AU$2.09 billion) in net inflows.
Solana ETFs also continued a nine-day streak. While Friday alone added US$17.3 million (AU$24.1 million), the whole streak has seen US$171.4 million (AU$239.1 million) flow into the SOL ETFs.
Read more: $457 Billion Crypto Tax Bombshell: Most Onchain Activity May Escape Global Reporting Rules
The post Analysts Say Bear Market’s Over as Bitcoin ETF Inflows Reverse appeared first on Crypto News Australia.
Hong Kong's stablecoin market gains a distributor bank as card transactions top $10B, while the UAE emerges as a model for the new sovereign stablecoin era.
The post Stablecoins boom as sovereign era arrives appeared first on CoinGeek.
In this piece, Kurt Wuckert Jr. looks at AI’s $1 trillion boom and how it faces a financing problem as uncertain revenue challenges the industry’s math.
The post The AI bubble needs 3 miracles appeared first on CoinGeek.
The upcoming FOMC meeting could be a critical turning point as macro and regulatory risks converge.
POL dropped 8.9% to a low of $0.092 amid intense selling pressure.
Gov. Greg Abbott ordered state agencies to stop paying for the AI-powered license-plate readers as privacy concerns and officer-misuse scandals mount across Texas.
The Nasdaq-listed asset manager paid an average of $79,431 per coin, lifting its total stash to 23,156 BTC amid a wave of renewed treasury buying.
Strategy raised $602.8 million by selling 4,531,421 MSTR common shares in one week, then split the proceeds among a renewed Bitcoin purchase, support for its STRC preferred stock, and additional cash.
The company's Aug. 31 filing attributed $369.7 million to buying Bitcoin, $151.8 million to repurchasing 1,557,177 STRC shares, $50.7 million to STRC dividends, and $30 million to its USD Cash account.
STRC is variable-rate cumulative perpetual preferred stock. The transaction shows Strategy using new common-stock proceeds for both Bitcoin accumulation and preferred-stock support.
The four disclosed uses total $602.2 million, $0.6 million below the filing's rounded $602.8 million net-proceeds figure. The filing reports each amount to one decimal place but does not separately reconcile the difference.

Strategy bought 4,603 BTC from Aug. 24 through Aug. 30 at an average price of $80,318, inclusive of fees and expenses. The purchase lifted its holdings from 840,447 BTC to 845,050 BTC, according to the filing and its official Bitcoin ledger.
The company reported an aggregate purchase cost of $63.73 billion and an average cost of $75,412 per BTC for the full position.
In its Aug. 24 filing, Strategy reported no Bitcoin purchases or sales during the prior weekly period. The Aug. 31 filing then reported the 4,603 BTC purchase, while the remaining proceeds funded other parts of the balance sheet.
Strategy sold no preferred shares through its at-the-market programs during the latest period. It instead used $202.5 million of the MSTR proceeds for STRC repurchases and dividends. After the buyback, the company said $364.8 million remained available under its wider preferred-stock repurchase program.
The final $30 million went to USD Cash, a flexible account that Strategy says may be used for Bitcoin purchases, expanding its reserve, capital management, and similar corporate purposes.
USD Cash is separate from the USD Reserve, which is intended to support preferred dividends and interest on outstanding debt. As of Aug. 30, Strategy reported $1.61 billion of USD Cash and a $5.1 billion USD Reserve.
Both balances included expected proceeds from at-the-market shares sold but not yet settled.
Bitcoin was still the largest disclosed destination for the week's MSTR proceeds. But the filing also shows how Strategy's common-stock issuance now feeds three distinct needs at once: Bitcoin holdings, preferred-stock obligations and buybacks, and flexible cash.
The post Strategy splits $603 million share sale between Bitcoin purchases and STRC support appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Ontology suspended mainnet block production to investigate a potential security concern, pausing the network while its technical team and validators reviewed the issue.
A public-node snapshot showed a gap of about five hours and six minutes since the chain's last recorded block.
The project announced the pause at 09:09 UTC on Aug. 31. Ontology called it a preventive measure and said it had not confirmed a security incident or found any indication that user assets had been lost or compromised. Based on the project's assessment at the time, its ONT and ONG crypto assets, along with other on-chain assets, remained unaffected.
Ontology's first-party notice said it identified the potential concern during a daily security check. The notice did not specify the technical condition under review, which systems might be involved, or what findings would allow production to resume.
The project said the suspension's duration was undetermined and that it would issue a separate announcement before or when the network resumed. It also said it would not process on-chain transactions while block production remained suspended. Ontology did not disclose a public restart timetable in the notice.
Those statements keep the episode distinct from a confirmed exploit or attack. The network interruption is clear, but the project's asset-safety statement was a preliminary assessment made while the review was still underway. Ontology did not report a loss, compromise, or active attack in either of its initial updates.
Ontology's developer documentation lists dappnode1.ont.io as a public MainNet node. A height request captured at 13:30:49 UTC returned block 20,770,893.
The record for that block carries a timestamp of 08:24:26 UTC on Aug. 31. The difference between the block timestamp and the later snapshot was five hours, six minutes, and 23 seconds.

That calculation measures time since the last block visible through the documented node. The node data does not explain why production stopped, but its unchanged height aligns with Ontology's statement that the mainnet had been suspended.
The next material update is whether validators resume block production and what Ontology's review finds. A restart would establish the final duration, while a later technical explanation could show whether the precautionary halt prevented an incident or addressed a concern that did not develop into one.
The post Ontology halts mainnet transactions as technical team investigates potential security issue appeared first on CryptoSlate.
HTTP error 410 on https://magazine.cointelegraph.com/feed
Failed to fetch feed.
Bitcoin Magazine

Strategy Opposes MSCI Proposal, Says Bitcoin Treasury Firms Are Being Targeted a Second Time
Bitcoin treasury Strategy has blasted Morgan Stanley Capital International’s proposal to exclude it from its Global Investable Market Indexes, calling it “misguided” and “flawed.”
Writing in a letter to MSCI Monday, the Nasdaq-listed Bitcoin behemoth’s founder, Michael Saylor, and CEO, Phong Le, said that the company was discriminating against digital asset businesses.
MSCI said earlier this month that it was consulting on a plan to define “non-operating companies” and make them ineligible for its Global Investable Market Indexes. The removal of such companies would exclude firms like Strategy from indexes visible to a large pool of institutional investors.
MSCI’s latest proposal comes after the company in 2025 proposed excluding from its indices all companies whose digital-asset holdings represent 50% or more of total assets.
“MSCI’s continued effort to discriminate against digital assets is misguided and calls into question MSCI’s neutrality and reliability,” Strategy’s letter read.
It added: “The proposal, like the 2025 proposal that MSCI withdrew, is discriminatory, arbitrary, and misguided. If adopted, the proposal would have no meaningful impact on Strategy’s business, but it would profoundly harm MSCI’s reputation as a reliable and neutral index provider. Like the 2025 proposal, the current proposal should be withdrawn.”
Strategy argued that MSCI was relying on unprecedented classifications to define Bitcoin as a “non-operating” asset. Strategy said it reports its Bitcoin business as an operating segment and its Bitcoin gains and losses as operating expenses.
The company said that MSCI’s methodology for targeting “non-operating companies” was “arbitrary and unexplained,” and was just a way of unfairly targeting digital asset treasuries.
Strategy further argued that the company is an operating one, employing 1,500 people across the globe and actively using its Bitcoin to “create shareholder value.”
Strategy — formerly MicroStrategy — is an enterprise software company that pivoted to buying and holding bitcoin in 2020. It first bought the cryptocurrency to protect shareholders but has since aggressively bought the asset and is now the largest corporate holder of the cryptocurrency, with 845,050 bitcoins worth $65.8 billion at today’s prices.
Investors can buy Strategy’s Nasdaq-listed stock (MSTR) to get heightened exposure to bitcoin’s performance.
MSTR closed Monday trading 4% higher. Year-to-date, the stock is down 15%.
This post Strategy Opposes MSCI Proposal, Says Bitcoin Treasury Firms Are Being Targeted a Second Time first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.
Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Unfazed by Trump’s Iran Threats
Bitcoin on Monday shrugged off tensions in the Middle East, barely moving despite U.S. President Donald Trump vowing to hit Iran hard.
The price of the biggest cryptocurrency recently stood at $79,076, unmoved over a 24-hour period. The coin also hasn’t budged from where it stood seven days ago.
Geopolitical strife has this year hurt Bitcoin’s price, with the cryptocurrency typically facing downward pressure on news of war and rallied in hopes of a ceasefire.
When the U.S. and Israel first attacked Iran in February, the coin nosedived, and had been shaky on news of war in March and April.
But in recent months, Bitcoin’s volatility has been muted, according to analysts, and Monday was no different: President Trump promised to hit Iran again but the asset didn’t flinch.
“We’re going to hit them hard,” President Trump was quoted telling a Fox News reporter on Monday. The U.S. and Iran started strikes again on Sunday — the first in over one month.
Bitcoin started a phenomenal run two weeks ago — its best in three years — and is up nearly 30% over the past month.
Its price started surging after the U.S. Treasury would at least double the size of its liquidity-support buyback operations. The announcement hurt the dollar but non-yielding assets like bitcoin and gold have benefited.
Positive regulatory news has also helped bitcoin this month: President Donald Trump last week said that the long-awaited crypto Clarity Act was a “very, very powerful” piece of legislation, and urged lawmakers to get it over the line.
The Clarity Act aims to establish a framework for distinguishing between digital assets that are securities, commodities or payment stablecoins — legislation that the crypto industry has long called for.
Investors have piled back into exchange-traded funds this month, too, which has also helped bitcoin’s price. From August 17 to 27, investors threw over $2.8 billion at the vehicles — the most since October.
Bitcoin reached as high as $81,281 last week before sliding again on Friday.
This post Bitcoin Unfazed by Trump’s Iran Threats first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.
Lazarus Group-linked wallets have moved more than $30 million through Hyperliquid, blockchain researcher Emmett Gallic reported.
The OFAC-sanctioned North Korean hacking group routed the funds through the platform’s HyperUnit service as recently as August 31.
The disclosure arrives while U.S. policymakers and Kraken’s parent company pursue a regulated pathway for Hyperliquid to enter American markets.
The timing places sanctioned wallet activity alongside efforts to bring the exchange under formal U.S. oversight.
Gallic identified the wallets as belonging to the Lazarus Group, a hacking collective sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control.
The addresses funneled Bitcoin into Hyperliquid before converting it into Ethereum and Solana. Funds were then bridged across Tron, Solana and Ethereum networks.
The same wallet cluster was previously flagged by researcher ZachXBT in 2024. That earlier investigation linked the addresses to $61 million in stolen funds. The 2024 identification gives the current activity added weight, since the wallets were already under watch.
From Hyperliquid, the converted assets moved to several centralized exchanges. Recipients included KuCoin, LBank and Kraken, plus a number of unlabeled Tron-based services. Distributing funds across multiple platforms is a common method used to obscure the destination of illicit proceeds.
Gallic posted the findings on X, stating the addresses had been actively moving funds through Hyperliquid as recently as the day before his post. He cited ZachXBT’s 2024 identification as the basis for attributing the wallets to the Lazarus Group.
The wallet movements surfaced as Hyperliquid pursues formal access to U.S. markets. President Donald Trump said in August that CFTC Chairman Mike Selig was working on a compliant pathway for Hyperliquid. The announcement signaled direct federal engagement with the platform’s U.S. prospects.
Separately, Kraken parent company Payward is reportedly in advanced talks with Hyperliquid Labs. The discussions center on letting U.S. users trade a subset of Hyperliquid-linked perpetual futures.
Regulated exchange and clearinghouse Bitnomial would support the structure, subject to regulatory approval.
Coin Bureau reported that HYPE rose nearly 50%, climbing from $57 to $84, following news of the U.S. talks. The account referenced Bloomberg’s report that Payward, which holds CFTC licensing, could bring on-chain perpetual futures to American traders for the first time.
A “Kraken HIP-3 test DEX” was also reportedly spotted on Hyperliquid’s testnet two weeks earlier. The test deployment included permission controls that could support U.S. compliance needs. Coin Bureau noted HYPE gained another 5% following the Bloomberg report on the talks.
The post Lazarus Group-linked Wallets Moves $30M+ via Hyperliquid Ahead of US Regulatory Push appeared first on Blockonomi.
a16z Crypto data show that 94% of peso-denominated crypto trading volume in Argentina now flows into stablecoins. That is the highest such share among major currencies tracked by Artemis.
The finding comes from a16z crypto’s latest look at Latin American crypto adoption, published August 30, 2026. About one in five Argentines use crypto, one of the highest rates in the region.
Downloads of the country’s 15 leading crypto apps climbed 93% year over year in 2024. That points to a shift from short-term inflation hedging toward habitual stablecoin use.
Argentina’s preference for dollars over its own currency predates the rise of stablecoins by decades. In 2001 and 2002, the government froze bank deposits.
It forcibly converted dollar accounts into pesos through Decree 214/2002. When the currency peg later collapsed, the exchange rate moved from one peso per dollar to nearly four. That shift erased about three-quarters of the peso’s dollar value.
That crisis left many Argentines wary of banks and the peso itself. Households grew accustomed to holding savings in physical dollar bills outside the financial system. This habit later shaped how people approached stablecoins once digital options became available.
Stablecoins gained momentum after Argentina reintroduced currency controls in 2019. Within months, officials capped individual dollar purchases at $200 per month.
Eligibility rules also shut out many residents entirely. Dollar-pegged stablecoins offered a workaround outside the restricted official market.
By 2023, capital controls had pushed the gap between official and parallel exchange rates above 100%, a16z crypto’s analysis noted. Stablecoins traded around the clock and sat outside those controls.
That made them attractive during that stretch. As Flores put it in the report, “buying crypto means buying dollars” in Argentina.
a16z crypto also points to stablecoins becoming a growing part of contractor pay during Argentina’s inflation spike. Year-over-year inflation reached 289% in April 2024.
Over that same period, the share of Argentina-based contractors paid in USDC rose, based on payroll data from Deel.
Deel figures indexed to January 2024 show contractor USDC pay and inflation moving together for a time. As of July 2026, both metrics were holding near one-fifth of their earlier peaks, the report found.
Exchange rate gaps that once made digital dollars pricier than official ones have also narrowed. Argentina lifted most restrictions on buying dollars in April 2025, and official and parallel rates converged. As of August 28, 2026, a digital dollar cost about 4% more than one bought through the official market.
Even as inflation falls and dollar purchases grow easier, usage tied to stablecoins has not faded, according to a16z crypto. Downloads of Lemon, one of Argentina’s largest crypto wallets, rose every quarter.
This happened even as monthly inflation dropped from 25.5% to 2.1%. Stablecoins now look less like a hedge and more like an everyday habit.
The post Argentina’s Peso Crypto Trading Goes 94% Stablecoins, a16z Finds appeared first on Blockonomi.
SpaceX stock falls below its IPO price despite 92% revenue growth as Thursday’s lock-up expiry threatens to add insider supply.
For over 350 years (roughly since 1661 when the first banknotes appeared in Europe), the relationship between gold and paper money has shaped global finance.